Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;7(9):1454-1461.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01655-0. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform

Affiliations

Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform

Aidan Combs et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Do anonymous online conversations between people with different political views exacerbate or mitigate partisan polarization? We created a mobile chat platform to study the impact of such discussions. Our study recruited Republicans and Democrats in the United States to complete a survey about their political views. We later randomized them into treatment conditions where they were offered financial incentives to use our platform to discuss a contentious policy issue with an opposing partisan. We found that people who engage in anonymous cross-party conversations about political topics exhibit substantial decreases in polarization compared with a placebo group that wrote an essay using the same conversation prompts. Moreover, these depolarizing effects were correlated with the civility of dialogue between study participants. Our findings demonstrate the potential for well-designed social media platforms to mitigate political polarization and underscore the need for a flexible platform for scientific research on social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Voelkel, J., Stagnaro, M., Chu, J., Pink, S. & Mernyk, J. Megastudy Identifying Successful Interventions to Strengthen Americans’ Democratic Attitudes (Institute for Policy Research Working Papers, 2022).
    1. Baldassarri, D. & Bearman, P. Dynamics of political polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72, 784–811 (2007). - DOI
    1. Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization Working Paper No. 26669 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
    1. DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y. & Macy, M. Why do liberals drink lattes? Am. J. Sociol. 120, 1473–1511 (2015). - DOI
    1. Finkel, E. J. et al. Political sectarianism in America. Science 370, 533–536 (2020). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources