Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts
- PMID: 37605515
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30807
Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts
Abstract
Background: Only few data is available for long-term outcomes of patients being treated for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG).
Aims: Thus, the aim of this observational, retrospective study was to close this lack of evidence.
Methods: Between January 2007 and February 2021 a total of 163 patients with 186 ISR lesions located in SVG were treated at two large-volume centers in Munich, Germany. Endpoints of interest were all-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI). Furthermore, recurrent ISR were assessed. Outcomes are presented as Kaplan-Meier event rates.
Results: Mean age was 72.6 ± 8.6 years, 90.8% were male, 36.8% were diabetics and 42.3% presented an acute coronary syndrome. ISR were treated with DES in 64.0% and with balloon angioplasty (BA) in 36.0%. After 10 years, the rates for all-cause mortality, TVMI and TLR were 58.2%, 15.4%, and 22.6%, respectively. No statistically relevant differences were found between the types of treatment (DES or BA) regarding all-cause mortality (55.7% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.181), TVMI (13.8% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.215) and TLR (21.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.764). Median time between first and recurrent ISR was 270.8 days. Recurrent ISR were treated with DES in a comparable proportion as during first ISR (p = 0.075). Independent predictor of TLR is patient age (p = 0.034). The median follow-up duration was 5.1 years (75% CI 2.8; 8.5).
Conclusions: Clinical event rates after intervention of ISR located in SVG are high without statistically relevant differences regarding the type of treatment. However, further studies are needed.
Keywords: drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; saphenous vein graft.
© 2023 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Robert A, Byrne MJ, Kastrati Adnan. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Grüntzig Lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3320-3331.
-
- Alfonso F, Byrne RA, Rivero F, Kastrati A. Current treatment of in-stent restenosis. JACC. 2014;63:2659-2673. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.545
-
- Cassese S, Byrne RA, Tada T, et al. Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10 004 patients with surveillance angiography. Heart. 2014;100:153-159. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304933
-
- Kufner S, Joner M, Thannheimer A, et al. Ten-year clinical outcomes from a trial of three limus-eluting stents with different polymer coatings in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2019;139:325-333. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038065
-
- Cassese S, Byrne RA, Schulz S, et al. Prognostic role of restenosis in 10 004 patients undergoing routine control angiography after coronary stenting. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:94-99. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu383
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
