Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1125-1134.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005313. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer

Affiliations

Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer

Stephanie Alimena et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the association between time to colposcopy and risk of subsequent cervical cancer.

Methods: A longitudinal analysis of patients aged 21-79 years with an abnormal cervical cancer test result from health care systems in Texas, Massachusetts, and Washington was performed. The outcome was a cervical cancer diagnosis 12 months or more after the abnormal result. The primary analysis compared receipt of colposcopy within 3 months (91 days or less) with receipt of colposcopy at 3-12 months (92-365 days) and no colposcopy within 12 months of the abnormal test result; post hoc analyses compared colposcopy within 12 months (365 days or less) with no colposcopy within 12 months. Associations were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for age, risk status, result severity, and health care system.

Results: Of 17,541 patients, 53.3% of patients received colposcopy within 3 months, 22.2% received colposcopy in 3-12 months, and 24.6% had no colposcopy within 12 months. One hundred forty-seven patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer within 12 months and removed from subsequent analyses. Sixty-five patients (0.4%) were diagnosed with cervical cancer more than 1 year (366 days or more) after the abnormal Pap or human papillomavirus test result. The risk of cervical cancer detection more than 1 year after the abnormal test result was not different in patients who received colposcopy within 3-12 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.54-2.12) and higher among patients with no colposcopy within 12 months (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.14) compared with patients who had colposcopy within 3 months. Post hoc analyses showed that the risk of cervical cancer diagnosis was 2.29-fold higher among those without colposcopy within 12 months compared with those who received colposcopy within 12 months (95% CI 1.37-3.83); among patients with high-grade cytology results, the risk of cervical cancer detection among those without colposcopy within 12 months was 3.12-fold higher compared with those who received colposcopy within 12 months (95% CI 1.47-6.70).

Conclusion: There was no difference in cervical cancer risk at more than 1 year between patients who received colposcopy within 3 months compared with those who received colposcopy within 3-12 months of an abnormal result. Patients who did not receive colposcopy within 12 months of an abnormal result had a higher risk of subsequent cervical cancer compared with those who received a colposcopy within 12 months.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Stephanie Alimena reports receiving payment from Roche Diagnostics. Sarah Feldman reports money was paid to her institution from the Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine. She received payment from UpToDate. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the initial management and follow-up periods after a qualifying abnormal cervical cancer test result. *Patients with cervical cancers detected during the initial management period were not included in the analysis as they had the outcome of interest before the start of follow-up.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to cervical cancer diagnosis after index abnormal cervical cancer test and initial management period, stratified by cytology result severity and risk status. Kaplan-Meier estimates for cumulative detection of cervical cancer after an abnormal cervical cancer test and the initial management period, stratified by result severity (n=17,394) (A–D). Cumulative detection estimates stratified by risk status are shown separately for high-grade abnormalities (n=3,662) (E–G). All results (A), high-grade (B), low-grade (C), persistent mild (D), high-grade results for patients under surveillance (E), high-grade results for patients at average risk (F), and high-grade results for patients of unknown risk (G). *P<.05; ***P<.001 based on the log-rank test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(6):791–794. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.6.791 [doi]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chao CR, Chubak J, Beaber EF, et al. Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings. Cancer Med. 2022. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5226 [doi]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Subramaniam A, Fauci JM, Schneider KE, et al. Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(2):110–113. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f515a2 [doi]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan MJ, Werner CL, Darragh TM, et al. ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Role of Colposcopy, Benefits, Potential Harms, and Terminology for Colposcopic Practice. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(4):223–229. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000338 [doi]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137(4):516–542. doi: 10.1309/AJCPTGD94EVRSJCG. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types