Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Aug;10(2):e000910.
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000910.

Anifrolumab in lupus nephritis: results from second-year extension of a randomised phase II trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Anifrolumab in lupus nephritis: results from second-year extension of a randomised phase II trial

David Jayne et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To characterise the safety and efficacy of anifrolumab in active lupus nephritis (LN) through year 2 of the phase II randomised, double-blind Treatment of Uncontrolled Lupus via the Interferon Pathway (TULIP)-LN trial (NCT02547922) of 2 anifrolumab dosing regimens versus placebo.

Methods: Patients received intravenous anifrolumab 900 mg for the first 3 doses followed by 300 mg anifrolumab (intensified regimen (IR)), 300 mg anifrolumab (basic regimen (BR)) or placebo every 4 weeks throughout. To continue into Year 2, patients must have achieved at least partial renal response and a glucocorticoid tapering target.

Results: Of 147 randomised patients, 101 completed Year 1 study treatment; of these, 75 (74%) continued into Year 2 (anifrolumab IR: n=29, BR: n=23 and placebo: n=23). During Year 2, 72% of patients reported ≥1 adverse event (AE); serious AEs were reported in 6.9%, 8.7% and 8.7% of patients (anifrolumab IR, BR and placebo, respectively); 3 patients discontinued treatment due to an AE (anifrolumab IR: n=2 and placebo: n=1) and herpes zoster was reported in 2 patients (anifrolumab IR: n=1 and BR: n=1). The study was ongoing at the start of the pandemic, but no COVID-19 cases were reported. Of the 145 patients receiving treatment, more patients on the IR attained complete renal response at Week 104 compared with those on BR or placebo (27.3% vs 18.6% and 17.8%) and simultaneously achieved sustained glucocorticoid tapering (IR: 25.0%; BR: 18.6% and placebo: 17.8%). The improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate were numerically larger in both anifrolumab groups versus placebo.

Conclusions: The safety and tolerability profile through Year 2 of TULIP-LN was generally consistent with Year 1, with promising efficacy results for the anifrolumab IR regimen. Collectively, the results support further investigation of an anifrolumab intensified dosing regimen in larger populations of patients with active proliferative LN.

Trial registration number: NCT02547922.

Keywords: autoimmune diseases; lupus nephritis; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DJ has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, CSL Vifor, Novartis, Roche and Takeda; has received honoraria from CSL Vifor and GSK; has received payment for participating in Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Boards for Chinook, GSK and Takeda and has stock or stock options in Aurinia. BR has received consulting fees from Aurinia, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Biocryst, Biogen, BMS, Calliditas, Chemocentryx, Corrona, EMD Serono, Exagen, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, GSK, Janssen, Kezar, Lilly, MorphoSys, Novartis, Omeros, Otsuka, Pfizer, Travere and University of Minnesota; has received speaker support from the American Society of Nephrology and the International Society of Nephrology and has a leadership or fiduciary role in the Lupus Foundation of America and KDIGO Glomerulonephritis Guideline group. EM has received grants or contracts from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen, Lilly and Pfizer; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer and Sanofi; has received payment for expert testimony from AbbVie and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AbbVie and Pfizer. RF has received consulting fees, payment or honoraria for speaking, support for attending meetings from and payment for participating in a Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca. FH has received grants or contracts from GSK and consulting fees from IDORSIA. RT is an employee of AstraZeneca. TT, JK, ES, WT and CL are employees of AstraZeneca and own stock or stock options.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition for the first and second years of the TULIP-LN study. *Percentages calculated using the full analysis set. Percentages calculated using the second-year population (patients who continued into the second year). AE, adverse event; BR, basic regimen; IR, intensified regimen; TULIP, Treatment of Uncontrolled Lupus via the Interferon Pathway.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficacy end points over time. Analyses were conducted excluding patients from France and Italy. All data after discontinuation were excluded from the analysis. (A) CRR required 24-hour UPCR ≤0.7 mg/mg, eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or no decrease ≥20% from baseline, no treatment discontinuation and no use of restricted medications. The response rates were calculated with a weighted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel controlling for stratification factors; percentages are based on the number of patients in the analysis, so the denominator remained the same each week (anifrolumab IR: n=44; anifrolumab BR: n=43; placebo: n=45). Non-responder imputation was applied in case of missing data in any of the CRR components. (B) Mean cumulative proteinuria (area under the curve in UPCR standardised by the expected follow-up time) was assessed using analysis of covariance controlling for baseline UPCR and stratification factors. Error bars represent SE. (C) Non-renal SLEDAI-2K change from baseline is expressed as least squares means which were calculated using a mixed model for repeated measures, controlling for stratification factors. Missing data for continuous end points were modelled under the missing-at-random assumption within the mixed model for repeated measures model. BR, basic regimen, CRR, complete renal response; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IR, intensified regimen; LS, least squares; n, number of subjects in the treatment group; SLEDAI-2K, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; UPCR, urine protein-creatinine ratio.

References

    1. Maroz N, Segal MS. Lupus nephritis and end-stage kidney disease. Am J Med Sci 2013;346:319–23. 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31827f4ee3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Ren Y, Chang J, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Arch Rheumatol 2018;33:17–25. 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6127 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narain S, Berman N, Furie R. Biologics in the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and lupus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020;32:609–16. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000754 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, et al. . 2019 Update of the joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:713–23. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ugarte A, Danza A, Ruiz-Irastorza G. Glucocorticoids and antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update and future directions. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:482–9. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000527 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources