Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Nov;82(11):1394-1403.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224476. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

Effect of tapered versus stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: a randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of tapered versus stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: a randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial

Siri Lillegraven et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) require treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to reach remission. It is debated whether tapering of TNFi to discontinuation should be considered in sustained remission. The aim of ARCTIC REWIND TNFi was to assess the effect of tapering TNFi to withdrawal compared with stable treatment on the risk of disease activity flares in patients with RA in remission ≥1 year.

Methods: This randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial was undertaken at nine Norwegian rheumatology departments. Patients with RA in remission ≥12 months on stable TNFi therapy were allocated by computer-based block-randomisation to tapering to discontinuation of TNFi or stable TNFi. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic co-medication was unchanged. The primary endpoint was disease flare during the 12-month study period (non-inferiority margin 20%), assessed in the per-protocol population.

Results: Between June 2013 and January 2019, 99 patients were enrolled and 92 received the allocated treatment strategy. Eighty-four patients were included in the per-protocol population. In the tapering TNFi group, 27/43 (63%) experienced a flare during 12 months, compared with 2/41 (5%) in the stable TNFi group; risk difference (95% CI) 58% (42% to 74%). The tapering strategy was not non-inferior to continued stable treatment. The number of total/serious adverse events was 49/3 in the tapering group, 57/2 in the stable group.

Conclusion: In patients with RA in remission for more than 1 year while using TNFi, an increase in flare rate was reported in those who tapered TNFi to discontinuation. However, most regained remission after reinstatement of full-dose treatment.

Trial registration numbers: EudraCT: 2012-005275-14 and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01881308.

Keywords: arthritis, rheumatoid; treatment; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SL, NPS, JS and EM report grants from The Research Council of Norway and from The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority during the conduct of the study. ABA reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. ICO, HF, CS, ÅL, IMH have nothing to disclose. CAH reports personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. GB reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. HH reports personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. TU reports personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. DHS reports that Abbvie donated drugs for a trial, that Amgen donated drugs for a trial, grants from Corrona, grants from Janssen, grants from Pfizer, grants from Roche/Genentech, outside the submitted work. DvdH reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Astellas, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Cyxone, personal fees from Daichii, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work; and is Director Imaging Rheumatology BV. TKK reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Celltrion, personal fees from Egis, personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Mylan, personal fees from Hikma, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Oktal, personal fees from Orion Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sandoz, personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from UCB, grants from BMS, outside the submitted work. EAH reports grants from The Research Council of Norway, grants from The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from UCB Pharma, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of patients in the ARCTIC REWIND TNFi Study. aRemission according to established criteria should be documented for at least 12 months. bDAS is a composite measure of disease activity with scores ranging from 0 to 10, higher scores indicate more disease activity, remission defined as <1.6. cStratified by study site. DAS, Disease Activity Score. TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flare rate (primary outcome) in tapered versus stable TNFi treatment flare was defined as a combination of Disease Activity Score (DAS) above the cut-off for remission (1.6), a change in DAS of at least 0.6, and at least two swollen joints or that both the treating physician and the patient agreed that a clinically significant flare had occurred. The dotted, vertical line represents the non-inferiority margin. aThe primary analysis was performed in all randomised patients meeting the study entry criteria and with no protocol deviations affecting the treatment efficacy (defined as failure to follow the treatment regimen or withdrawal from the study). bSeven patients who were randomised but did not have verified initiation of treatment are excluded (five from the tapering group and two from the stable group). cAnalysis performed in patients within the primary analysis population who used methotrexate co-medication. csDMARD, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Secondary endpoints. Analysed in the primary analysis population, defined as all randomised patients meeting the study entry criteria and with no protocol deviations affecting the treatment efficacy. Patients were followed up for a median (IQR) of 364 days (358–378 days) in the tapered group and 366 days (357–378 days) in the stable group. Variables are displayed based on clinical relevance. Boxes mark first and third quartiles, the band inside the box is the second quartile (the median), while the whiskers indicate the highest and lowest values within 1.5 × the IQR. Dots denote individual patients (outliers).a Disease Activity Score (DAS, range 0–10) includes a 44 swollen joint count assessment of tender joints by the Ritchie Articular Index, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and patient’s global assessment of disease activity on a VAS 0–100 mm. Remission is defined as any value below 1.6, low disease activity 1.6–2.4, moderate disease activity >2.4–3.7 and high disease activity >3.7, thus higher scores indicating more disease activity. bPROMIS assesses the ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living. The total score is translated into a T score with a mean (SD) of 50 (10). A score of 50 equals the average for the general US population. cThe van der Heijde–modified Sharp scoring method assesses erosions in 16 joints of each hand and 6 joints of each foot, and the erosions are given a score of 1 to 5. Joint space narrowing is assessed in 15 joints for each hand and 6 joints for each foot. This gives scores for erosions on a scale of 0–280 and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0–168, thus the total van der Heijde–modified Sharp score ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater joint damage. A good radiographic outcome is commonly defined as no progression. dDisease Activity Score at the visit before a flare occurred, at the flare visit, and at visits after flare in the half-dose arm in those with all components available to calculate DAS. A flare could be recorded both at regular visits and at additional visits. PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information 20-item Short Form Physical Function; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor; VAS Visual Analogue Scale.

Comment in

References

    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2016;388:2023–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schett G, Emery P, Tanaka Y, et al. Tapering biologic and conventional DMARD therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: current evidence and future directions. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1428–37. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209201 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. American college of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73:924–39. 10.1002/acr.24596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:3–18. 10.1136/ard-2022-223356 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uhrenholt L, Christensen R, Dinesen WKH, et al. Risk of flare after tapering or withdrawal of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022;61:3107–22. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab902 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data