Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 2;83(1):65-71.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224270.

Initial glucocorticoid bridging in rheumatoid arthritis: does it affect glucocorticoid use over time?

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Initial glucocorticoid bridging in rheumatoid arthritis: does it affect glucocorticoid use over time?

Lotte van Ouwerkerk et al. Ann Rheum Dis. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the use of glucocorticoids (GC) over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were or were not treated initially with GC bridging therapy.

Methods: Data from the BeSt, CareRA and COBRA trials were combined in an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. We compared GC use between bridgers and non-bridgers at 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline with mixed-effects regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean cumulative GC dose until 24 months after baseline with and without the bridging period, Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints (DAS28) over time and number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) changes.

Results: 252/625 patients (40%) were randomised to GC bridging (bridgers). Excluding the period of bridging, later GC use was low in both groups and cumulative doses were similar. Mean DAS28 was similar between the groups, but bridgers improved more rapidly (p<0.001) in the first 6 months and the bridgers required significantly fewer changes in DMARDs (incidence rate ratio 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.94)). GC use was higher in the bridgers at t=12 months (OR 3.27 (95% CI 1.06 to 10.08)) and the bridging schedules resulted in a difference in cumulative GC dose of 2406 mg (95% CI 1403 to 3408) over 24 months.

Conclusion: In randomised trials comparing GC bridging and no GC bridging, bridgers had a more rapid clinical improvement, fewer DMARD changes and similar late use of GC compared with non-bridgers. GC bridging per protocol resulted, as could be expected, in a higher cumulative GC dose over 2 years.

Keywords: antirheumatic agents; arthritis, rheumatoid; glucocorticoids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LvO, PHPdJ, RBML, JSS and TWJH declare no competing interests. MB: reports speaker fees from Novartis and Pfizer, and provided expert testimony for Celltrion. PV: holds the Pfizer Chair Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Management as well as the Galapagos Chair in RA at KU Leuven and received consultancy and/or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma, Roularta and Sidekick Health within the last 24 months. SAB: received an ASPIRE grant from Pfizer. CFA: received study grants for BeSt and IMPROVED from Centocor (now Janssen) and AbbVie, respectively. PE: provided expert advice to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. And clinical trials: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. WL received study grants from Pfizer and consultancy speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Galapagos and UCB.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms