Glycaemic control and insulin therapy are significant confounders of the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 37608126
- PMCID: PMC11108876
- DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02268-3
Glycaemic control and insulin therapy are significant confounders of the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: A high body mass index (BMI) confers a paradoxical survival benefit in patients with heart failure (HF) or diabetes mellitus (DM). There is, however, controversy whether an obesity paradox is also present in patients with HF and concomitant DM. In addition, the influence of glycaemic control and diabetes treatment on the presence or absence of the obesity paradox in patients with HF and DM is unknown.
Methods: We identified 2936 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the HF registries of the universities of Heidelberg, Germany, and Hull, UK (general sample). Of these, 598 (20%) were treated for concomitant DM (DM subgroup). The relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality was analysed in both the general sample and the DM subgroup. Patients with concomitant DM were stratified according to HbA1c levels or type of diabetes treatment and analyses were repeated.
Results: We found an inverse BMI-mortality relationship in both the general sample and the DM subgroup. However, the obesity paradox was less pronounced in patients with diabetes treated with insulin and it disappeared in those with poor glycaemic control as defined by HbA1c levels > 7.5%.
Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, a higher BMI is associated with better survival irrespective of concomitant DM. However, insulin treatment and poor glycaemic control make the relationship much weaker.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Heart failure; Mortality; Obesity paradox; Reverse epidemiology.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Atar reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Novartis and personal fees from MSD (outside the submitted work). Prof. Cleland reports personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Idorsia, grants and personal fees from Vifor, grants and personal fees from Pharmacosmos, grants and personal fees from Cytokinetics, personal fees from Servier, non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Innolife, personal fees from Torrent, grants and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, grants and personal fees from Myokardia, personal fees from Respicardia, grants and personal fees from Stealth Biopharmaceuticals, and grants and personal fees from Viscardia (outside the submitted work). Prof. Frankenstein reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer (outside the submitted work). Prof. Frey reports personal fees from Boehringer and personal fees from AstraZeneca (outside the submitted work).
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
