Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 4:4:1070501.
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1070501. eCollection 2023.

The pursuit of intimacy: intimate relationship development for women with physical disabilities

Derek Ruiz  1 , Alexandra Kriofske Mainella  2 , David A Rosenthal  3
Affiliations

The pursuit of intimacy: intimate relationship development for women with physical disabilities

Derek Ruiz et al. Front Rehabil Sci. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to intimate relationship development among women with physical disabilities is crucial for promoting positive rehabilitation outcomes. This study investigates these factors using a Consensual Qualitative Research approach.

Methods: The research team utilized Consensual Qualitative Research. Consensual Qualitative Research is widely used in various social services to address limitations inherent limitations of other qualitative methods. Women with various physical disabilities (n=6) were identified and interviewed using a utilized a semi-structured interview. Their attitudes towards intimacy, outcome expectancy, and self-concept of women with physical disabilities were examined. The impact of physical disabilities, including disability stigma, on these factors was also assessed. Data was coded utilizing multiple researcher consensus as well as an auditor to consensually agree upon domains and core ideas while taking into account validity and trustworthiness, as per the methodology chosen.

Results: The study discovered general themes (100% representation) concerning core values and barriers to intimacy, societal barriers to intimate relationships, and hope for future relationships. Typical themes (50-83% representation) included non-romantic intimacy, physical barriers to intimacy, perceived limitations, and negative outcome expectancies. Across the board, the influence of disability limitations, identity, and societal attitudes became evident. The role of rehabilitation professionals in advocating for social skills development and self-confidence enhancement emerged as crucial.

Conclusions: The study illuminated barriers to intimacy among women with physical disabilities, such as societal stigma and self-concept associated with disability. The critical role of rehabilitation professionals in normalizing intimacy discussions and equipping individuals with necessary social skills and self-confidence was underscored. This focus could yield enhanced intimate relationship outcomes and improve the quality of life for women with physical disabilities.

Keywords: consensual qualitative research; disability; intimacy; physical disability; relationship development; sexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Anderson RJ, Antonak RF. The influence of attitudes and contact on reactions to persons with physical and speech disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull. (1992) 35:240–7.
    1. Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: the scope of the term and its breadth of measurement. Qual Life People Disabil Models Res Pract. (1997) 16:51–74. 10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrina N, Carter M, Stephenson J, Sweller N. Perceived friendship quality of children with autism spectrum disorder as compared to their peers in mixed and non-mixed dyads. J Autism Dev Disord. (2016) 46:1334–43. 10.1007/s10803-015-2673-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nosek MA, Rintala DH, Young ME, Howland CA, Foley CC, Rossi D, et al. Sexual functioning among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1996) 77(2):107–15. 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90154-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman C. Intimate relationships of people with disabilities. Inclusion. (2019) 7(1):41–56. 10.1352/2326-6988-7.1.41 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources