Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 22;8(3):e22.00044.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00044. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

Reimagining the Path of an Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Application: A Survey of Program Directors

Stewart A Bryant  1 , Achraf H Jardaly  2 , Brent A Ponce  3 , S Trent Guthrie  4 , Harris Slone  5 , Jeremy R Bruce  6
Affiliations
Review

Reimagining the Path of an Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Application: A Survey of Program Directors

Stewart A Bryant et al. JB JS Open Access. .

Abstract

Background: Few evidence-based suggestions are available to help applicants and mentors improve reapplication outcomes. We sought to provide program directors' (PDs) perspectives on actionable steps to improve reapplicants' chances for a match.

Methods: The PDs were asked to rank positions unmatched applicants can pursue, steps these applicants can take for the next application cycle, and reasons why reapplicants do not match.

Results: Responses from 66 of 123 PDs were received (53.6% response rate). Obtaining new recommendation letters and rotating with orthopaedics were the highest 20 ranked steps unmatched applicants can take. No curriculum vitae (CV) improvement, poor interview, and poor letters of recommendation were the most important reasons hindering applicants from matching when reapplying.

Conclusions: Steps reapplicants could prioritize include obtaining new recommendation letters, rotating in orthopaedics, and producing new research items. CV strengthening and improving interview skills address the 2 main reasons why unmatched applicants failed in subsequent attempts.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A545).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Program directors' response to “do you offer interviews to previously unmatched applicants?”
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The percentage of program directors ranking each step as rank 1 or 2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. DePasse JM, Palumbo MA, Eberson CP, Daniels AH. Academic characteristics of orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from 2007 to 2014. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(9):788-95. - PubMed
    1. National Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the match: senior students of U.S. MD medical schools. Characteristics of U.S. MD seniors who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2020 main residency match. Accessed July 27, 2021. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Char....
    1. Chen AF, Secrist ES, Scannell BP, Patt JC. Matching in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(4):135-44. - PubMed
    1. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2021 main residency match. Accessed July 27, 2021. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/MRM-....
    1. Schrock JB, Kraeutler MJ, Dayton MR, McCarty EC. A comparison of matched and unmatched orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from 2006 to 2014: data from the national resident matching program. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(1):e1. - PubMed