Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 Aug 7:2023.08.04.552020.
doi: 10.1101/2023.08.04.552020.

MRIO: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology

Affiliations

MRIO: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology

Alexander Bartnik et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is a useful tool in both the clinic and research settings, aiding in the diagnosis and treatments of neurological disease and expanding our knowledge of the brain. However, there are many challenges inherent in managing and analyzing MRI data, due in large part to the heterogeneity of data acquisition.

Materials and methods: To address this, we have developed MRIO, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology.

Results: MRIO provides well-reasoned classes and logical axioms for the acquisition of several MRI acquisition types and well-known, peer-reviewed analysis software, facilitating the use of MRI data. These classes provide a common language for the neuroimaging research process and help standardize the organization and analysis of MRI data for reproducible datasets. We also provide queries for automated assignment of analyses for given MRI types.

Discussion: MRIO aids researchers in managing neuroimaging studies by helping organize and annotate MRI data and integrating with existing standards such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine and the Brain Imaging Data Structure, enhancing reproducibility and interoperability. MRIO was constructed according to Open Biomedical Ontologies Foundry principals and has contributed several terms to the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations to help bridge neuroimaging data to other domains.

Conclusion: MRIO addresses the need for a "common language" for MRI that can help manage the neuroimaging research, by enabling researchers to identify appropriate analyses for sets of scans and facilitating data organization and reporting.

Keywords: Biomedical; Translational Research; biological ontologies; magnetic resonance imaging; neuroimaging; neuroinformatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Magnetic resonance imaging assay: Our contributed terms and edits to the magnetic resonance imaging assay term from OBI (OBI:0002985). We added axioms for the pulse sequence protocol used in MRI acquisition, as well as an evaluant role used to tie back to the raw magnetic resonance image data set (OBI:0003354) output via its relation to the magnetic resonance imaging participant (OBI:0003329).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MRI acquisition types: The acquisition of MRI data from a scanner is represented in MRIO in two steps: the imaging assay that describes the process and the image data set that describes the data itself. A) Different MRI acquisition types are defined according to their acquisition parameters, each with the own logical and semantic definitions. We group similar MRI acquisition types together (i.e. T1 weighted MRI is commonly used to refer to T1 weighted images acquired using spin echo (SE) or gradient echo (GRE) sequences). B) Reconstructed MRI are often the output of specific MR imaging assay sequences, while some are produced by other MRI analyses and data transformations. These classes represent the data that is used clinically or analyzed in the research setting.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Magnetic resonance image data set analysis: The process of analyzing MRI data follows the format of OBI’s data transformation, applying algorithms to reconstructed magnetic resonance image data sets to produce some information content entity. The output could be a specific value or even a new, transformed magnetic resonance image data set.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
MRI analysis terms: MRIO contains groups of common neuroimaging analyses types, with specific analyses included as child classes. Specific MRI analyses are grouped by similar processes or the regions of the brain they analyze.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
DICOM to BIDS transformation: BIDS specifies directory structures and naming conventions for storing MRI data on a file system, making BIDS datasets easier for a human to read and work with than raw DICOMs. MRIO can serve as a middle layer between DICOM and BIDS datasets, with terms that map standardized DICOM tags to the naming conventions specified by BIDS. Additionally, analysis terms from MRIO – including the name of the analysis and kind of data produced – can be used to annotate analyses of BIDS data sets, which BIDS call “derivates.”

Similar articles

References

    1. Smits M. MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2021;17(8):486–500. - PubMed
    1. Kehoe EG, McNulty JP, Mullins PG, Bokde ALW. Advances in MRI biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomarkers in medicine. 2014;8(9):1151–1169. - PubMed
    1. Tavazzi E, Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, et al. MRI biomarkers of disease progression and conversion to secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2020;20(8):821–834. - PubMed
    1. Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E. Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(4):920–927. doi: 10.1007/s003300101100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gorgolewski KJ, Auer T, Calhoun VD, et al. The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci Data. 2016;3:160044. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types