Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Oct;20(6):1696-1706.
doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01415-y. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

Effectiveness of Ocrelizumab in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-world Study (OPPORTUNITY)

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effectiveness of Ocrelizumab in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-world Study (OPPORTUNITY)

Clara G Chisari et al. Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Ocrelizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody selectively targeting CD20-expressing B cells. The effect of ocrelizumab on primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) has been evaluated during phase 3 trials that enrolled patients under 55 years with a maximum Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 6.5. However, little is known on older disabled patients with longer disease duration. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of ocrelizumab in PPMS patients out of the ORATORIO eligibility criteria. This multicenter retrospective study collected data about the effectiveness of ocrelizumab in PPMS patients who received treatment between May 2017 and June 2022 in the Italian MS centers contributing to the Italian MS Registry who adhered to the Compassionate Use Program. The confirmed EDSS worsening (CEW) (defined as either a ≥ 1-point or ≥ 2-point increase in EDSS score from baseline that was confirmed at T12 and T24) was calculated. At the date of data extraction, out of 887 PPMS patients who had received ocrelizumab, 589 (mean age 49.7 ± 10.7 years, 242 (41.1%) females) were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 41.3 ± 12.3 months. A total of 149 (25.3%) received ocrelizumab according to the ORATORIO criteria (ORATORIO group) and 440 (74.7%) outside the ORATORIO criteria (non-ORATORIO group). No differences in terms of cumulative probabilities of 12 and 24 months of CEW of ≤ 1 point were found between ORATORIO and non-ORATORIO groups. Cox regression analyses showed that age older than 65 years (HR 2.51, 25% CI 1.07-3.65; p = 0.01) was associated with higher risk of CEW at 24 months. Patients not responding to ORATORIO criteria for reimbursability may benefit from ocrelizumab treatment, as disease activity, disease duration, and EDSS seem to not impact the disability outcome. Our results may suggest to extend the possible use of this powerful agent in selected patients under the age of 65 years.

Keywords: Efficacy; Multiple sclerosis; Ocrelizumab; Primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CGC has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. AB received compensation for consulting services and participation in advisory board and travel grants from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi- Genzyme, and Merck-Serono. VBM declares no conflict of interest. MC received compensation for speaking activities, travel grant, and participation in advisory board from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. FC has received travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Roche and research grants from Merck. PC received honoraria as speaker or travel grants to attend national and international conferences or consultation for advisory boards from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Cellgene-BMS, Merck-Serono, Teva, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Janssen. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Merck Serono. CC declares no conflict of interest. CrC declares no conflict of interest. MD declares no conflict of interest. MF is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology; Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Neurological Sciences, and Radiology; received compensation for consulting services from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chiesi Italia SpA, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and TEVA; participation in Advisory Boards for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Takeda; scientific direction of educational events for Biogen, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA). PI has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. RL declares no conflict of interest. AL declares no conflict of interest. ALu has served as a Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi/Genzyme Advisory Board Member. She received congress and travel/accommodation expense compensations or speaker honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche (2020), Sanofi/Genzyme, and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM). Her institutions received research grants from Novartis and Sanofi/Genzyme. SLF has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. GL has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. AGM is an advisory board member of Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Almirall, Alexion, and Roche and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Janssen, Viatris, and Bristol-Myers Squiibb. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Merck Serono. FM received compensation for speaking activities, travel grant, and participation in advisory board from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Merck-Serono. MM received compensation for consulting services, speaking activities, and participation in advisory board from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, and Viatris; he received research support from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and Roche. LM received compensation for speaking activities, travel grant, and participation in advisory board from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Biogen, and Alexion. CP received compensation for speaking activities, travel grant and participation in advisory board from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme. SR received compensation for speaking activities, travel grant, and participation in advisory board from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Viatris. ST declares no conflict of interest. MT reported receiving speaker honoraria and research grants to her institution from and serving on advisory boards of Biogen, Merck Serono, and Novartis. DV declares no conflict of interest. FP has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member from the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients’ selection flow chart. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis. The ORATORIO group includes patients fulfilling the ORATORIO eligibility criteria for ocrelizumab treatment (age of 18 to 55 years, EDSS of 3.0 to 6.5, disease duration less than 15 years in patients with an EDSS score of more than 5.0 at screening or less than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 5.0 or less [14]); non-ORATORIO includes patients not fulfilling the ORATORIO criteria
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients who reached 1-point CEW at 24 months, stratified according to the presence of disease activity in ORATORIO and non-ORATORIO groups (A), in each non-ORATORIO subgroup (B), and in each age category (C). CEW, confirmed EDSS worsening of at least 1 point at 24 months; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cox regression analysis of developing confirmed EDSS worsening (CEW) at 24 months. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; OCR, ocrelizumab.*p value = 0.01
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier curves for the time of reaching 1-point CEW at 24 months during treatment with ocrelizumab in the entire cohort (A), and in patients stratified according to EDSS (≤ 6.5 and > 6.5) (B), disease duration (≤ 15 or 10 and > 15 or 10 years) (C), and age (≤ 55, 56–64 and > 65 years) (D). CEW, confirmed EDSS worsening of at least 1 point at 24 months; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; DD, disease duration

References

    1. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(1):121–127. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(6):840–846. doi: 10.1002/ana.20703. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2017. - PubMed
    1. Chataway J. Evolving diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):118. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30463-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ntranos A, Lublin F. Diagnostic criteria, classification and treatment goals in multiple sclerosis: the chronicles of time and space. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(10):90. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0688-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding