Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Aug 23:9:e51494.
doi: 10.2196/51494.

Can AI Mitigate Bias in Writing Letters of Recommendation?

Affiliations
Editorial

Can AI Mitigate Bias in Writing Letters of Recommendation?

Tiffany I Leung et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Abstract

Letters of recommendation play a significant role in higher education and career progression, particularly for women and underrepresented groups in medicine and science. Already, there is evidence to suggest that written letters of recommendation contain language that expresses implicit biases, or unconscious biases, and that these biases occur for all recommenders regardless of the recommender's sex. Given that all individuals have implicit biases that may influence language use, there may be opportunities to apply contemporary technologies, such as large language models or other forms of generative artificial intelligence (AI), to augment and potentially reduce implicit biases in the written language of letters of recommendation. In this editorial, we provide a brief overview of existing literature on the manifestations of implicit bias in letters of recommendation, with a focus on academia and medical education. We then highlight potential opportunities and drawbacks of applying this emerging technology in augmenting the focused, professional task of writing letters of recommendation. We also offer best practices for integrating their use into the routine writing of letters of recommendation and conclude with our outlook for the future of generative AI applications in supporting this task.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; bias; career advancement; gender bias; implicit bias; large language models; leadership; letters of recommendation; medical education; promotion; sponsorship; tenure and promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: TIL is the scientific editorial director for JMIR Publications.

References

    1. Schmader T, Whitehead J, Wysocki VH. A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles. 2007;57(7-8):509–514. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18953419 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein RH, Macy MW, Williams WM, Cameron CJ, Williams-Ceci SC, Ceci SJ. Assessing gender bias in particle physics and social science recommendations for academic jobs. Soc Sci. 2022 Feb 14;11(2):74. doi: 10.3390/socsci11020074. - DOI
    1. Houser C, Lemmons K. Implicit bias in letters of recommendation for an undergraduate research internship. J Furth High Educ. 2017 Apr 24;42(5):585–595. doi: 10.1080/0309877x.2017.1301410. - DOI
    1. Grimm LJ, Redmond RA, Campbell JC, Rosette AS. Gender and racial bias in radiology residency letters of recommendation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt A):64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.008.S1546-1440(19)30994-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madera JM, Hebl MR, Martin RC. Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: agentic and communal differences. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1591–1599. doi: 10.1037/a0016539.2009-21033-018 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types