Improving Surveillance of Human Tick-Borne Disease Risks: Spatial Analysis Using Multimodal Databases
- PMID: 37610812
- PMCID: PMC10483298
- DOI: 10.2196/43790
Improving Surveillance of Human Tick-Borne Disease Risks: Spatial Analysis Using Multimodal Databases
Abstract
Background: The extent of tick-borne disease (TBD) risk in the United States is generally unknown. Active surveillance using entomological measures, such as presence and density of infected nymphal Ixodes scapularis ticks, have served as indicators for assessing human risk, but results have been inconsistent and passive surveillance via public health systems suggests TBDs are underreported.
Objective: Research using various data sources and collection methods (eg, Google Trends, apps, and tick bite encounters [TBEs] reports) has shown promise for assessing human TBD risk. In that vein, and engaging a One Health perspective, this study used multimodal databases, geographically overlaying patient survey data on TBEs and concomitant reports of TBDs with data drawn from other sources, such as canine serological reports, to glean insights and to determine and assess the use of various indicators as proxies for human TBD risk.
Methods: This study used a mixed methods research strategy, relying on triangulation techniques and drawing on multiple data sources to provide insights into various aspects of human disease risk from TBEs and TBDs in the United States. A web-based survey was conducted over a 15-month period beginning in December 2020 to collect data on TBEs. To maximize the value of the covariate data, related analyses included TBE reports that occurred in the United States between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2021. TBEs among patients diagnosed with Lyme disease were analyzed at the county level and compared to I scapularis and I pacificus tick presence, human cases identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and canine serological data. Spatial analyses employed multilayer thematic mapping and other techniques.
Results: After cleaning, survey results showed a total of 249 (75.7%) TBEs spread across 148 respondents (61.9% of all respondents, 81.7% of TBE-positive respondents); 144 (4.7%) counties in 30 states (60%) remained eligible for analysis, with an average of 1.68 (SD 1.00) and median of 1 (IQR 1) TBEs per respondent. Analysis revealed significant spatial matching at the county level among patient survey reports of TBEs and disease risk indicators from the CDC and other official sources. Thematic mapping results included one-for-one county-level matching of reported TBEs with at least 1 designated source of human disease risk (ie, positive canine serological tests, CDC-reported Lyme disease, or known tick presence).
Conclusions: Use of triangulation methods to integrate patient data on TBE recall with established canine serological reports, tick presence, and official human TBD information offers more granular, county-level information regarding TBD risk to inform clinicians and public health officials. Such data may supplement public health sources to offer improved surveillance and provide bases for developing robust proxies for TBD risk among humans.
Keywords: Lyme disease; One Health model; entomological; entomology; risk; spatial; surveillance; thematic mapping; tick; tick bite encounter; tick-borne disease surveillance; triangulation; vector.
©Sarah P Maxwell, Chris Brooks, Dohyeong Kim, Connie L McNeely, Seonga Cho, Kevin C Thomas. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 23.08.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Assessing Tick-Borne Disease Risk and Surveillance: Toward a Multi-Modal Approach to Diagnostic Positioning and Prediction.Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 18;10(4):832. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040832. Microorganisms. 2022. PMID: 35456881 Free PMC article.
-
Triangulating the New Frontier of Health Geo-Data: Assessing Tick-Borne Disease Risk as an Occupational Hazard among Vulnerable Populations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159449. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35954807 Free PMC article.
-
Tick-Borne Surveillance Patterns in Perceived Non-Endemic Geographic Areas: Human Tick Encounters and Disease Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 21;9(6):771. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060771. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34205506 Free PMC article.
-
Tick-Borne Diseases in Turkey: A Review Based on One Health Perspective.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 15;10(12):e0005021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005021. eCollection 2016 Dec. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016. PMID: 27977689 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection, characterization, and prediction of tick-borne disease foci.Int J Med Microbiol. 2002 Jun;291 Suppl 33:11-20. doi: 10.1016/s1438-4221(02)80003-0. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002. PMID: 12141734 Review.
Cited by
-
Different environmental factors predict the occurrence of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and reveal new potential risk areas across Europe via geospatial models.Int J Health Geogr. 2025 Mar 14;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12942-025-00388-9. Int J Health Geogr. 2025. PMID: 40087786 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With the Spatial Distribution of Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome in Zhejiang Province, China: Risk Analysis Based on Maximum Entropy.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 2;10:e46070. doi: 10.2196/46070. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39104047 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted Tick-Borne Disease Recognition: Assessing Risk for Improved Public Health.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 10;12(10):984. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12100984. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38786395 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Influence of Climate Change and Environmental Factors on the Top Tick-Borne Diseases in the United States: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 27;12(1):50. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010050. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 38257877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Allergic reactions associated with medically relevant arthropods.Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2286531. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2286531. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Ann Med. 2023. PMID: 38010429 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rodino KG, Theel ES, Pritt BS. Tick-borne diseases in the United States. Clin Chem. 2020;66(4):537–548. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa040. https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/66/4/537/5814095?login=false 5814095 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Preventing tick bites. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. [2021-09-10]. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/prev/index.html .
-
- Scheerer C, Rüth M, Tizek L, Köberle M, Biedermann T, Zink A. Googling for ticks and Borreliosis in Germany: nationwide google search analysis from 2015 to 2018. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e18581. doi: 10.2196/18581. https://www.jmir.org/2020/10/e18581/ v22i10e18581 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Beaujean D, van Velsen L, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Maat A, van Steenbergen JE, Crutzen R. Using risk group profiles as a lightweight qualitative approach for intervention development: an example of prevention of tick bites and lyme disease. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(2):e45. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2760. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2013/2/e45/ v2i2e45 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pesälä S, Virtanen MJ, Sane J, Jousimaa J, Lyytikäinen O, Murtopuro S, Mustonen P, Kaila M, Helve O. Health care professionals' evidence-based medicine internet searches closely Mimic the known seasonal variation of Lyme Borreliosis: a register-based study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6764. https://publichealth.jmir.org/2017/2/e19/ v3i2e19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical