Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing in Support of Public Health
- PMID: 37611169
- PMCID: PMC10484207
- DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04529
Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing in Support of Public Health
Abstract
Wastewater-based testing (WBT) for SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly expanded over the past three years due to its ability to provide a comprehensive measurement of disease prevalence independent of clinical testing. The development and simultaneous application of WBT measured biomarkers for research activities and for the pursuit of public health goals, both areas with well-established ethical frameworks. Currently, WBT practitioners do not employ a standardized ethical review process, introducing the potential for adverse outcomes for WBT professionals and community members. To address this deficiency, an interdisciplinary workshop developed a framework for a structured ethical review of WBT. The workshop employed a consensus approach to create this framework as a set of 11 questions derived from primarily public health guidance. This study retrospectively applied these questions to SARS-CoV-2 monitoring programs covering the emergent phase of the pandemic (3/2020-2/2022 (n = 53)). Of note, 43% of answers highlight a lack of reported information to assess. Therefore, a systematic framework would at a minimum structure the communication of ethical considerations for applications of WBT. Consistent application of an ethical review will also assist in developing a practice of updating approaches and techniques to reflect the concerns held by both those practicing and those being monitored by WBT supported programs.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; Wastewater-based epidemiology; building-scale; ethics; structured review; sub-sewershed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Figures

Update of
-
Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jun 14:2023.06.12.23291231. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.12.23291231. medRxiv. 2023. Update in: Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 5;57(35):12969-12980. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04529. PMID: 37398480 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Ivanova O. E.; Yarmolskaya M. S.; Eremeeva T. P.; Babkina G. M.; Baykova O. Y.; Akhmadishina L. V.; Krasota A. Y.; Kozlovskaya L. I.; Lukashev A. N. Environmental Surveillance for Poliovirus and Other Enteroviruses: Long-Term Experience in Moscow, Russian Federation, 2004–2017. Viruses 2019, 11 (5), 424.10.3390/v11050424. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lago P. M.; Gary H. E.; Pérez L. S.; Cáceres V.; Olivera J. B.; Puentes R. P.; Corredor M. B.; Jímenez P.; Pallansch M. A.; Cruz R. G. Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater and Stools Following an Immunization Campaign in Havana, Cuba. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32 (5), 772–777. 10.1093/ije/dyg185. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chavarria-Miró G.; Anfruns-Estrada E.; Martínez-Velázquez A.; Vázquez-Portero M.; Guix S.; Paraira M.; Galofré B.; Sánchez G.; Pintó R. M.; Bosch A. Time Evolution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Wastewater during the First Pandemic Wave of COVID-19 in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87 (7), e02750-2010.1128/AEM.02750-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Crits-Christoph A.; Kantor R. S.; Olm M. R.; Whitney O. N.; Al-Shayeb B.; Lou Y. C.; Flamholz A.; Kennedy L. C.; Greenwald H.; Hinkle A.; Hetzel J.; Spitzer S.; Koble J.; Tan A.; Hyde F.; Schroth G.; Kuersten S.; Banfield J. F.; Nelson K. L. Genome Sequencing of Sewage Detects Regionally Prevalent SARS-CoV-2 Variants. mBio 2021, 12 (1), e02703-2010.1128/mBio.02703-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous