Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;42(8):1769-1776.
doi: 10.1002/nau.25266. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

Men and women experience different barriers to care seeking for fecal incontinence

Affiliations

Men and women experience different barriers to care seeking for fecal incontinence

Madeline K Moureau et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Despite effective treatments for fecal incontinence (FI), FI remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study sought to characterize and compare rates of, delays in, experiences with, and barriers to care seeking for FI among men and women.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of electronic survey data collected from adults with FI. The survey included the use of a validated instrument to assess FI severity and questions that now comprise a validated instrument for assessing barriers to care seeking for FI in women. Descriptive analyses characterized differences between men and women. χ2 testing for categorical variables and t-testing for normally distributed continuous variables compared statistical differences.

Results: The sample (N = 548) was predominately female (84%), non-Hispanic White (90%), and insured (96%), with a mean Vaizey score (13.4 ± 5.3) consistent with moderate or severe FI. Care seeking rates (p = 0.81) and symptom duration before care seeking (p = 0.23) did not differ between women and men, but women were more likely than men to be told that effective treatments exist; most male and female respondents who sought care were offered treatment. Very few respondents had been asked about FI by a healthcare provider. Whereas normative thinking, limited life impact, and believing that a healthcare provider could not help were more common barriers to care seeking among men, avoidance, fear, and discouragement were more common in women.

Conclusions: Men and women with FI seek care at similar rates and after experiencing symptoms for a similar duration of time. Very few patients with FI have been screened for it by a healthcare provider. Barriers to FI care seeking are different for women and men, and men are less likely than women to be informed about effective treatments by a healthcare provider.

Keywords: accidental bowel leakage; barriers to care; fecal incontinence; female; male; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest: Dr. Brown receives royalties from Wolters-Kluwer, Inc and Springer, Inc for publications she has authored. Dr. Brown is a consultant for Grand Rounds, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram FI, fecal incontinence
The CONSORT diagram depicts the recruitment and enrollment of respondents in this study. Among 58,579 emails sent, 548 respondents (458 women, 90 men) were eligible for inclusion in this analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Commonly endorsed barriers to care seeking for fecal incontinence (FI), stratified by gender
Figure 2 displays rates of reported barriers to care seeking for fecal incontinence (FI) faced by respondents, stratified by sex. Fear of or lack of knowledge about treatment for FI were the most commonly cited barriers by both men and women.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bharucha AE. Fecal Incontinence. https://gi.org/topics/fecal-incontinence/#tabs2
    1. Menees SB, Almario CV, Spiegel BMR, Chey WD. Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Fecal Incontinence: Results From a Population-Based Survey. Gastroenterology. 05 2018;154(6):1672–1681.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.062 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, et al. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. Aug 2009;137(2):512–7, 517.e1–2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, et al. Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. Jul 2005;129(1):42–9. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 1996;91(1):33–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources