Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 8:11:1222125.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1222125. eCollection 2023.

A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects in the framework of competition

Beata Gavurova  1 , Miroslav Kelemen  2 , Volodymyr Polishchuk  3 , Tawfik Mudarri  4 , Volodymyr Smolanka  5
Affiliations

A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects in the framework of competition

Beata Gavurova et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Our research aims to support decision-making regarding the financing of healthcare projects by structural funds with policies targeting reduction of the development gap among different regions and countries of the European Union as well as the achievement of economic and social cohesion. A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects should rank the project applications for the selected region, accounting for the investor's wishes in the form of a regional coefficient in order to reduce the development gap between regions. On the one hand, our proposed model evaluates project applications based on selected criteria, which may be structured, weakly structured, or unstructured. On the other hand, it also incorporates information on the level of healthcare development in the region. The obtained ranking increases the degree of validity of the decision regarding the selection of projects for financing by investors, considering the level of development of the region where the project will be implemented. At the expense of European Union (EU) structural funds, a village, city, region, or state can receive funds for modernization and development of the healthcare sector and all related processes. To minimize risks, it is necessary to implement adequate support systems for decision-making in the assessment of project applications, as well as regional policy in the region where the project will be implemented. The primary goal of this study was to develop a complex fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of projects in the field of healthcare with the aim of reducing the development gap between regions. Based on the above description, we formed the following scientific hypothesis for this research: if the project selected for financing can successfully achieve its stated goals and increase the level of development of its region, it should be evaluated positively. This evaluation can be obtained using a complex fuzzy model constructed to account for the region's level of development in terms of the availability and quality of healthcare services in the region where the project will be implemented.

Keywords: European Green Deal; decision-making; expert evaluation; fuzzy sets; healthy cities; industry 5.0; projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural scheme of the complex fuzzy model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Clark J, Horton R. A coming of age for gender in global health. Lancet. (2019) 393:2367–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30986-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrovic D, de Mestral C, Bochud M, Bartley M, Kivimäki M, Vineis P, et al. . The contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health: a systematic review. Prev Med. (2018) 113:15–31. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, et al. . Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:2468–81. 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helgesen MK, Fosse E, Hagen S. Capacity to reduce inequities in health in Norwegian municipalities. Scand J Public Health. (2017) 45(18_suppl.):77–82. 10.1177/1403494817709412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luy M, Minagawa Y. Gender gaps-Life expectancy and proportion of life in poor health. Health reports. (2014) 25:12. 10.1093/eurpub/cku211 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types