Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Aug 22;2023(8):rjad428.
doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad428. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Emergent conversion from single-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with subsequent obstruction of entero-enteric anastomosis by ascaris

Affiliations
Case Reports

Emergent conversion from single-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with subsequent obstruction of entero-enteric anastomosis by ascaris

Mauricio Palacios et al. J Surg Case Rep. .

Abstract

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), the third most commonly performed procedure worldwide, has shown excellent results in terms of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities compared with other bariatric surgeries. However, its use remains limited in various parts of the world due to postoperative complications. After the efficacy of this procedure was established, the focus of treatment shifted toward resolving postoperative complications. Protein-energy malnutrition after OAGB is one of the main issues that needs to be addressed. There are several operative options for patients who require revision surgery including reversal and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The conversion from OAGB to RYGB is a feasible method that has shown excellent results when performed by experts in the field. Here, we present the case of a woman with symptoms of acute obstruction secondary to OAGB who underwent conversion to RYGB under emergent conditions.

Keywords: OAGB; RYGB; bariatric surgery; complications; obstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Computed Tomography: Afferent loop bending and gastroenteric anastomotic stenosis. (B) Radiograph showing distal efferent obstruction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showing gastroenteric anastomotic stenosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagram showing the conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Acute inflammatory changes associated with gastrojejunal anastomosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ascaris lumbricoides extracted from the anastomosis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Diagram showing the construction of a new entero-enteric anastomosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perez Galaz F, Moedano Rico K, Lopez-Acosta ME, Raffoul Cohen I, Cervantes Gutierrez O, Cuevas Bustos R, et al. Conversion from mini bypass to laparoscopic roux en Y gastric bypass in an emergency setting: case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020;75:32–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voon K, Huang CK, Patel A, Wong LF, Lu YC, Hsin MC. Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is effective in dealing with late complications of OAGB: experience from a tertiary bariatric Center and literature review. J Metab Bariatr Surg 2021;10:32–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mora Oliver I, Cassinello Fernández N, Alfonso Ballester R, Cuenca Ramírez MD, Ortega SJ. Revisional bariatric surgery due to failure of the initial technique: 25 years of experience in a specialized unit of obesity surgery in Spain. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2019;97:568–74 English, Spanish. - PubMed
    1. Jedamzik J, Bichler C, Felsenreich DM, Gensthaler L, Eichelter J, Nixdorf L, et al. Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why-a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022;18:225–32. - PubMed
    1. Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, De Luca M, Greco F, Raffaelli M, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg 2017;27:2956–67. - PubMed

Publication types