Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25;5(1):37795.
doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.37795. eCollection 2022.

Experts' Perceived Patient Burden and Outcomes of Knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (Kafos) Vs. Microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot Orthoses (Mp-sscos)

Affiliations

Experts' Perceived Patient Burden and Outcomes of Knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (Kafos) Vs. Microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot Orthoses (Mp-sscos)

B Brüggenjürgen et al. Can Prosthet Orthot J. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with neuromuscular knee-instability assisted with orthotic devices experience problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and orthotic device outcomes in patients in need for advanced orthotic knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs).

Methodology: An observer-based semi-structured telephone interview with orthotic care experts in Germany was applied. Interviews were transcribed and content-analysed. Quantitative questions were analysed descriptively.

Findings: Clinical experts from eight centres which delivered an average of 49.9 KAFOs per year and 13.3 microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs) since product availability participated. Reported underlying conditions comprised incomplete paraplegia (18%), peripheral nerve lesions (20%), poliomyelitis (41%), post-traumatic lesions (8%) and other disorders (13%). The leading observed patient burdens were "restriction of mobility" (n=6), followed by "emotional strain" (n=5) and "impaired gait pattern" (n=4). Corresponding results for potential patient benefits were seen in "improved quality-of-life" (n=8) as well as "improved gait pattern" (n=8) followed by "high reliability of the orthosis" (n=7). In total, experts reported falls occurring in 71.5% of patients at a combined annual frequency of 7.0 fall events per year when using KAFOs or stance control orthoses (SCOs). In contrast, falls were observed in only 7.2 % of MPSSCO users.

Conclusion: Advanced orthotic technology might contribute to better quality of life of patients, improved gait pattern and perceived reliability of orthosis. In terms of safety a substantial decrease in frequency of falls was observed when comparing KAFO and MP-SSCO users.

Keywords: Ankle Foot Orthoses; KAFO; Knee Instability; MP-SCCOs; Microprocessor Orthoses; Patient Burden; Poliomyelitis; Quality of Life; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Bernd Brüggenjürgen, Frank Braatz, Bernhard Greitemann, Axel Ruetz, Friedemann Steinfeldt, Daiwei Yao, and Christina Stukenborg-Colsman received lecture fees; Heiko Drewitz is an employee of Otto Bock; Michael Schäfer, Wolfgang Seifert have collaborations with the sponsor. Claudia Weichold none to be declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Patient impairments and burden as perceived by experts
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Expert-observed frequency of impairments (reported more than one time). Categories (always, often, sometimes, seldom, never) were transferred to 0-100-scale with 100 representing the highest frequency “always”.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Reported expert-perceived patient benefits.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Relevance of suggested patient assessment criteria.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Observed long-term consequences (primary axis: number of experts reporting, secondary axis: Transposed frequency of consequences in percent of time occurring - Categories (always, often, sometimes, seldom, never) were transferred to 0-100-scale with 100 representing the highest frequency “always”.)

References

    1. O’Connor J, McCaughan D, McDaid C, Booth A, Fayter D, Rodriguez-Lopez R, et al.. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: systematic review, qualitative study, survey and costing analysis. Health technology assessment. 2016;20(55):1-262. DOI: 10.3310/hta20550 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox JR, Lovegreen W. 22 - Lower Limb Orthoses. In: Webster JB, Murphy DP, editors. Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices (Fifth Edition). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019; 239-46.e1.
    1. McDaid C, Fayter D, Booth A, O’Connor J, Rodriguez-Lopez R, McCaughan D, et al.. Systematic review of the evidence on orthotic devices for the management of knee instability related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e015927. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015927 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Probsting E, Kannenberg A, Zacharias B. Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace((R)) Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(1):65-77. DOI: 10.1177/0309364616637954 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arazpour M, Ahmadi F, Bani MA, Hutchins SW, Bahramizadeh M, Ghomshe FT, et al.. Gait evaluation of new powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis in able-bodied persons: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1177/0309364613486917 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources