Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Dec;37(12):e15110.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.15110. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

Clinical outcomes of a prospective randomized comparison of bioreactance monitoring versus pulse-contour analysis in a stroke-volume based goal-directed fluid resuscitation protocol in brain-dead organ donors

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical outcomes of a prospective randomized comparison of bioreactance monitoring versus pulse-contour analysis in a stroke-volume based goal-directed fluid resuscitation protocol in brain-dead organ donors

Gary F Marklin et al. Clin Transplant. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Eighty percent of brain-dead (BD) organ donors develop hypotension and are frequently hypovolemic. Fluid resuscitation in a BD donor is controversial. We have previously published our 4-h goal-directed stroke volume (SV)-based fluid resuscitation protocol which significantly decreased time on vasopressors and increased transplanting four or more organs. The SV was measured by pulse-contour analysis (PCA) or an esophageal doppler monitor, both of which are invasive. Thoracic bioreactance (BR) is a non-invasive portable technology that measures SV but has not been studied in BD donors. We performed a randomized prospective comparative study of BR versus PCA technology in our fluid resuscitation protocol in BD donors. Eighty-four donors (53.1%) were randomized to BR and 74 donors to PCA (46.8%). The two groups were well matched based on 24 demographic, social, and initial laboratory factors, without any significant differences between them. There was no difference in the intravenous fluid infused over the 4-h study period [BR 2271 ± 823 vs. PCA 2230 ± 962 mL; p = .77]. There was no difference in the time to wean off vasopressors [BR 108.8 ± 61.8 vs. PCA 150.0 ± 68 min p = .07], nor in the number of donors off vasopressors at the end of the protocol [BR 16 (28.6%) vs. PCA 15 (29.4%); p = .92]. There was no difference in the total number of organs transplanted per donor [BR 3.25 ± 1.77 vs. PCA 3.22 ± 1.75; p = .90], nor in any individual organ transplanted. BR was equivalent to PCA in clinical outcomes and provides a simple, non-invasive, portable technology to monitor fluid resuscitation in organ donors.

Keywords: bioreactance; brain-dead organ donor; donor management; esophageal doppler; fluid resuscitation; goal-directed fluid therapy; organ procurement organization; protocol; pulse-contour analysis; stroke volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Marklin GF, Klinkenberg WD, Helmers B, Ahrens T. A stroke volume-based fluid resuscitation protocol decreases vasopressor support and may increase organ yield in brain-dead donors. Clin Transplant. 2020;34:e13784. doi:10.1111/ctr.13784
    1. Smith M. Physiologic changes during brain stem death-lessons for management of the organ donor. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23:S217-222.
    1. Cinotti R, Roquilly A, Mahe PJ, et al. Pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy in donors: a multicentric echocardiographic observational study. J Crit Care. 2014;29:489-494.
    1. Chudoba P, Krajewski W, Wojciechowska J, Kaminska D. Brain death associated pathological event and therapeutic options. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017;26:1457-1464.
    1. Pennefather SH, Bullock RE, Dark JH. The effect of fluid therapy on alveolar arterial oxygen gradient in brain-dead donors. Transplantation. 1993;56:1418-1422.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources