Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Proximal Humerus Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications
- PMID: 37616466
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00061
Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Proximal Humerus Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications
Abstract
Background: In smaller studies, allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) has been used for proximal humerus bone loss with some success, although with notable complication risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to describe outcomes and complications after proximal humerus APC and how major APC complications are defined in the literature.
Methods: A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on APC for proximal humeral bone loss secondary to tumor, fracture, or failed arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included postoperative range of motion, outcome scores (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant, visual analog scale [VAS], and subjective shoulder value [SSV]), and complication incidence. We also described individual study definitions of APC malunion/nonunion, methods of postoperative evaluation, malunion/nonunion rates, allograft fracture/fragmentation rates, and mean union time, when available. Secondarily, we compared hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Results: Sixteen articles including 375 shoulders were evaluated (average age: 49 years, follow-up: 54 months). Fifty-seven percent of procedures were performed for tumors, 1% for proximal humerus trauma sequelae, and 42% for revision arthroplasty. Average postoperative forward elevation was 82° (69-94°), abduction 60° (30-90°), and external rotation 23° (17-28°). Average MSTS score was 82% (77%-87%), SST score 5.3 (4.5-6.1), ASES score 64 (54-74), Constant score 44 (38-50), VAS score 2.2 (1.7-2.7), and SSV 51 (45-58). There was a 51% complication rate with an 18% nonallograft surgical complication rate, 26% APC nonunion/malunion/resorption rate, and 10% APC fracture/fragmentation rate. Fifteen percent of nonunited APCs underwent secondary bone grafting; 3% required a new allograft; and overall revision rate was 12%. APC nonunion/malunion was defined in 2 of 16, malunion/nonunion rates in 14 of 16, fracture/fragmentation rates in 6 of 16, and mean union time (7 months) in 4 of 16 studies.
Conclusion: APC reconstruction of the proximal humerus remains a treatment option, albeit with substantial complication rates. In addition, there is a need for APC literature to report institutional definitions of nonunion/malunion, postoperative evaluation, and time to union for a more standardized evaluation.
Level of evidence: Level IV; systematic review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/A992).
Similar articles
-
Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Humeral Bone Loss in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20;99(24):2069-2076. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01495. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 29257012
-
Reverse Allograft Prosthetic-Composite Versus Endoprosthesis Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Humerus Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes and Complications.Indian J Orthop. 2024 Sep 1;58(10):1339-1348. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01248-7. eCollection 2024 Oct. Indian J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39324078 Review.
-
Management of proximal humerus bone loss with allograft prosthetic composite technique in shoulder arthroplasty.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6):1306-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.038. Epub 2023 Nov 18. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. PMID: 37981001
-
Does reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) have surgical benefits over hemiarthroplasty with APC in patients with tumors of the proximal humerus?Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;52(12):1408-1415. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac147. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36189620
-
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of massive proximal humeral bone loss: a systematic review.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jul;34(7):e579-e591. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.028. Epub 2024 Nov 22. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. PMID: 39579863
Cited by
-
Graft Infections in Biologic Reconstructions in the Oncologic Setting: A Systematic Review of the Literature.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4656. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164656. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200798 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lozano-Calderón SA, Chen N. Proximal humerus allograft prosthetic composites: technique, outcomes, and pearls and pitfalls. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015;8(4):324-33.
-
- Sanchez-Sotelo J, Wagner ER, Sim FH, Houdek MT. Allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction for massive proximal humeral bone loss in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(24):2069-76.
-
- King JJ, Nystrom LM, Reimer NB, Gibbs CP, Scarborough MT, Wright TW. Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(1):45-54.
-
- Potter BK, Adams SC, Pitcher JD, Malinin TI, Temple HT. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):1035-41.
-
- Reif T, Schoch B, Spiguel A, Elhassan B, Wright T, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Wilke BK. A retrospective review of revision proximal humeral allograft-prosthetic composite procedures: an analysis of proximal humeral bone stock restoration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(7):1353-8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous