Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;34(11):1035-1046.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

HER2-low expression in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

Affiliations

HER2-low expression in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

B Uzunparmak et al. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low is a newly defined category with HER2 1+ or 2+ expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and lack of HER2 gene amplification measured by in situ hybridization (ISH). Much remains unknown about the HER2-low status across tumor types and changes in HER2 status between primary and metastatic samples.

Patients and methods: HER2 expression by IHC was evaluated in 4701 patients with solid tumors. We have evaluated the HER2 expression by IHC and amplification by ISH in paired breast and gastric/gastroesophageal (GEJ) primary and metastatic samples. HER2 expression was correlated with ERBB2 genomic alterations evaluated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ samples.

Results: HER2 expression (HER2 IHC 1-3+) was found in half (49.8%) of the cancers, with HER2-low (1 or 2+) found in many tumor types: 47.1% in breast, 34.6% in gastric/GEJ, 50.0% in salivary gland, 46.9% in lung, 46.5% in endometrial, 46% in urothelial, and 45.5% of gallbladder cancers. The concordance evaluation of HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer samples showed that HER2 3+ remained unchanged in 87.1% with a strong agreement between primary and metastatic samples, with a weighted kappa (Κ) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.91). ERBB2 alterations were identified in 117 (7.5%) patients with non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ solid tumors who had NGS testing. Of 1436 patients without ERBB2 alterations, 512 (35.7%) showed any level HER2 expression by IHC.

Conclusion: Our results show that HER2-low expression is frequently found across tumor types. These findings suggest that many patients with HER2-low solid tumors might benefit from HER2-targeted therapies.

Keywords: ERBB2 amplification; HER2 amplification; HER2 expression; HER2-low; targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Distribution of HER2 IHC expression levels across cancers.
Histologies with ≥10 patients have been included in the graph. Refer to Table 1 for more detailed information. CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CUP, cancer of unknown primary; FT, fallopian tube cancer; GEJ, gastroesophageal; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HN-ACC, head and neck-adenoid cystic carcinoma; HN, head and neck; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Distribution of HER2 expression levels evaluated in metastatic samples of stage-IV breast and gastric/ GEJ cancer patients.
(A) Pie chart showing the distribution of HER2 IHC expression levels in the breast cohort (n = 867). (B) Bar plot showing the distribution of HER2 ISH levels for evaluable breast cases. (C) Pie chart showing the distribution of HER2 IHC expression levels in the gastric/GEJ cohort (n = 48). (D) Bar plot showing the distribution of HER2 ISH levels for evaluable gastric/GEJ cases. (E) Bar plot showing the distribution of HER2 expression levels in the breast (n = 850) and gastric/GEJ (n = 44) cohorts. HER2 expression levels were defined as: HER2-negative = HER2 IHC 0, HER2-low = HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+, and ISH: Non-amplified, HER2-positive = HER2 IHC 3+ and/or ISH: Amplified (Please refer to the Methods section for more detailed information). GEJ, gastroesophageal; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Comparison of HER2 expression levels in paired primary and metastasis samples of patients with metastatic breast and gastric/ GEJ cancer.
Flow diagrams and complementary tables showing the evolution of HER2 expression from primary to metastatic (A) breast (n = 640) and (B) gastric/GEJ (n = 25) cancers. HER2 expression levels were defined as: HER2-negative = HER2 IHC 0, HER2-low = HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+, and ISH: Non-amplified, HER2-positive = HER2 IHC 3+ and/or ISH: Amplified (Please refer to the Methods section for more detailed information). Row percentages have been used in the construction of tables. GEJ, gastroesophageal; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; NGS, next-generation sequencing.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Distribution of HER2 IHC expression levels by ERBB2 alterations in patients with non-breast, non-gastric/ GEJ histologies.
(A) Flow diagram of the ERBB2 alteration co-occurrence study. (B) Bar plot shows distribution of HER2 IHC expression levels by ERBB2 alterations identified by tissue- and/or cfDNA-based NGS testing using a panel that includes ERBB2 in patients with non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ histologies (n = 1553). Please refer to Supplementary Table S3, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.005, for more detailed information on patients with ERBB2 alterations. Panels (C) and (D) show the distribution of HER2 IHC scores in non-breast, non-gastric/GEJ patients with ERBB2 alterations identified by tissue-based (n = 85) and cfDNA-based (n = 32) NGS testing, respectively. Please refer to Supplementary Table S4, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.005, for more detailed information. cfDNA, circulating free DNA; GEJ, gastroesophageal; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NGS, next-generation sequencing.

References

    1. Gutierrez C, Schiff R. HER2: biology, detection, and clinical implications. 2011. (1543–2165 (Electronic)). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al. Use of Chemotherapy plus a Monoclonal Antibody against HER2 for Metastatic Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344 (11): 783–792. - PubMed
    1. Cooke T, Reeves J, Lanigan A et al. HER2 as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2001; 12 Suppl 1: S23–28. - PubMed
    1. Gravalos C, Jimeno A. HER2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (9): 1523–1529. - PubMed
    1. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353 (16): 1659–1672. - PubMed

Publication types