Relationship between adverse events prevalence, patient safety culture and patient safety perception in a single sample of patients: a cross-sectional and correlational study
- PMID: 37620259
- PMCID: PMC10450132
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060695
Relationship between adverse events prevalence, patient safety culture and patient safety perception in a single sample of patients: a cross-sectional and correlational study
Abstract
Objective: To assess the relationship between adverse events prevalence (AEP), patient safety culture (PSC) and patient safety perception (PSP).
Design: Cross-sectional, ex post facto comparative study on a single sample of patients.
Setting: Four medium-high-level hospitals were included in the study-two public and two private from Zulia State in Venezuela.
Participants: 556 medical records and patients were studied for the prevalence and PSP study, and 397 of the healthcare providers involved in the care of these patients were surveyed for the PSC study, at two public and two private hospitals.
Outcome measurement: The primary outcome of this study was the association between AEP, PSC and PSP, and according to hospital funding type, private and public.
Results: An inverse association was observed between AEP and its severity and Patient Safety Culture Index (rho=-0.8, p=0.5) (95% CI 0.26-0.10) and Patient Safety Perception Index (rho=-0.6, p=0.18) (95% CI 0.10-0.28), which were protective factors for patient safety. No association was identified between PSC and PSP (rho=0.0001). No statistical differences were identified by hospital type (p=0.93) (95% CI 0.70-1.2).
Conclusions: The analysis of the variable correlations studied (AEP, PSC and PSP) within the same sample offers an interesting and useful perspective. In this sample, although no correlation was observed between the three variables as an interacting set, some correlation patterns were observed between pairs of variables that could guide further studies.
Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; Health & safety; PUBLIC HEALTH.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessing patient safety culture in Tunisian operating rooms: A multicenter study.Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):176-182. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw157. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017. PMID: 28073903
-
A baseline assessment of patient safety culture and its associated factors from the perspective of critical care nurses: Results from 10 hospitals.Aust Crit Care. 2021 Jul;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 26. Aust Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 33121872
-
Predictors of patient safety culture in hospitals in Venezuela: A cross-sectional study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 7;100(18):e25316. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025316. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 33950920 Free PMC article.
-
Similarities and differences in the associations between patient safety culture dimensions and self-reported outcomes in two different cultural settings: a national cross-sectional study in Palestinian and Belgian hospitals.BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e021504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021504. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30061439 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of patient safety culture in private and public hospitals in Peru.Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 1;30(3):186-191. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx165. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018. PMID: 29228295
Cited by
-
Nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture and adverse events in Hail City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional approach to improving healthcare safety.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e084741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084741. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39237280 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous