Types of Engagement Strategies to Engage High-Risk Patients in VA
- PMID: 37620722
- PMCID: PMC10681963
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08336-8
Types of Engagement Strategies to Engage High-Risk Patients in VA
Abstract
Background: Many healthcare systems seek to improve care for complex high-risk patients, but engaging such patients to actively participate in their healthcare can be challenging.
Objective: To identify and describe types of patient engagement strategies reported as successfully deployed by providers/teams and experienced by patients in a Veterans Health Administration (VA) intensive primary care (IPC) pilot program.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews with 29 VA IPC staff (e.g., physicians, nurses, psychologists) and 51 patients who had at least four IPC team encounters. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a combination a priori/inductive approach.
Results: The engagement strategies successfully deployed by the IPC providers/teams could be considered either more "facilitative," i.e., facilitated by and dependent on staff actions, or more "self-sustaining," i.e., taught to patients, thus cultivating their ongoing patient self-care. Facilitative strategies revolved around enhancing patient access and coordination of care, trust-building, and addressing social determinants of health. Self-sustaining strategies were oriented around patient empowerment and education, caregiver and/or community support, and boundaries and responsibilities. When patients described their experiences with the "facilitative" strategies, many discussed positive proximal outcomes (e.g., increased access to healthcare providers). Self-sustaining strategies led to positive (self-reported) longer-term clinical outcomes, such as behavior change.
Conclusion: We identified two categories of strategies for successfully engaging complex, high-risk patients: facilitative and self-sustaining. Intensive primary care program leaders may consider thoughtfully building "self-sustaining" engagement strategies into program development. Future research can confirm their effectiveness in improving health outcomes.
© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes that Matter: High-Needs Patients' and Primary Care Leaders' Perspectives on an Intensive Primary Care Pilot.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3366-3372. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06869-4. Epub 2021 May 13. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33987789 Free PMC article.
-
Engaging High-Need Patients in Intensive Outpatient Programs: A Qualitative Synthesis of Engagement Strategies.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1937-1944. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4608-2. Epub 2018 Aug 10. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30097977 Free PMC article.
-
What Do Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Teams Need to Improve Care for Primary Care Patients with Complex Needs?J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2717-2723. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06563-x. Epub 2021 Jan 28. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33511564 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Retention in primary care among unstably housed residents of a low-income, inner-city neighborhood with a high prevalence of substance use and related disorders.Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 28;23(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02332-y. Int J Equity Health. 2024. PMID: 39609880 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chang ET, Raja PV, Stockdale SE, Katz ML, Zulman DM, Eng JA, et al. What are the key elements for implementing intensive primary care? A multisite Veterans Health Administration case study. Healthc (Amst). 2018;6(4):231-237. 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.10.001. - PubMed
-
- McCarthy D, Ryan J, Klein S. Models of care for high-need, high-cost patients: an evidence synthesis. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015;31:1–19. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources