Functional outcomes of soft palate reconstruction after oncologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37620732
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08191-7
Functional outcomes of soft palate reconstruction after oncologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze functional outcomes of soft palate reconstruction after oncologic surgery.
Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA statement. A single arm meta-analysis was performed for feeding tube dependence (FTD) (primary outcome), velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and hypernasality (HN) (secondary outcomes) incidences.
Results: A total of 510 patients (males: 77.75%, n = 353/454) with a median age of 58 years (n = 480/510; 95% CI 57.0-61.0) who underwent soft palate surgical resection with primary reconstruction were included. Overall, the cumulative FTD rate was 1.55% (n = 28/510; 95% CI 0.24-3.96%), the VPI rate was 22.18% (n = 119/379; 95% CI 12.99-33.02%), and the HN rate was 33.01% (n = 88/234; 95% CI 19.03-46.61%).
Conclusions: Soft palate reconstruction results in a low incidence of FTD, and most patients resume a full oral diet. Both obturators, primary closure, local and free flaps seem good reconstructive options. Nevertheless, more specific postoperative functional deficiencies like VPI and HN owns higher incidences, potentially affecting the quality of the swallowing and speaking function and the patient's quality of life.
Keywords: Feeding tube; Flap; Functional outcomes; Head and neck cancer; Soft palate.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Lechner M (2022) HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer : epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00603-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Head and Neck Cancers (version 1.2022). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf . Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_4
-
- Stelmes JJ, Gregoire V, Poorten VV et al (2019) Organ preservation and late functional outcome in oropharyngeal carcinoma: rationale of EORTC 1420, the “Best of” Trial. Front Oncol 22(9):999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00999 . (PMID: 31696052; PMCID: PMC6817682) - DOI
-
- Golusinski P, Corry J, Poorten VV et al (2021) De-escalation studies in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: how should we proceed? Oral Oncol 123:105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105620 . (PMID: 34798575) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hardman JC, Holsinger FC, Brady GC et al (2022) Transoral robotic surgery for recurrent tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract (RECUT): an international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 114(10):1400–1409. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac130 . (PMID: 35944904; PMCID: PMC9552281) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
