Development and comparison of machine learning-based models for predicting heart failure after acute myocardial infarction
- PMID: 37620904
- PMCID: PMC10463624
- DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02240-1
Development and comparison of machine learning-based models for predicting heart failure after acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Aims: Heart failure (HF) is one of the common adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the predictive efficacy of numerous machine learning (ML) built models is unclear. This study aimed to build an optimal model to predict the occurrence of HF in AMI patients by comparing seven ML algorithms.
Methods: Cohort 1 included AMI patients from 2018 to 2019 divided into HF and control groups. All first routine test data of the study subjects were collected as the features to be selected for the model, and seven ML algorithms with screenable features were evaluated. Cohort 2 contains AMI patients from 2020 to 2021 to establish an early warning model with external validation. ROC curve and DCA curve to analyze the diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefit of the model respectively.
Results: The best performer among the seven ML algorithms was XgBoost, and the features of XgBoost algorithm for troponin I, triglycerides, urine red blood cell count, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, glucose, urine specific gravity, prothrombin time, prealbumin, and urea were ranked high in importance. The AUC of the HF-Lab9 prediction model built by the XgBoost algorithm was 0.966 and had good clinical benefits.
Conclusions: This study screened the optimal ML algorithm as XgBoost and developed the model HF-Lab9 will improve the accuracy of clinicians in assessing the occurrence of HF after AMI and provide a reference for the selection of subsequent model-building algorithms.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Extreme gradient boosting; Heart failure; Machine learning; Model.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Predicting the risk of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction using an interpretable machine learning model.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 24;12:1444323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1444323. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 39925976 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-based risk prediction of malignant arrhythmia in hospitalized patients with heart failure.ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5363-5371. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13627. Epub 2021 Sep 28. ESC Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 34585531 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e38082. doi: 10.2196/38082. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35943767 Free PMC article.
-
[Application of machine learning model based on XGBoost algorithm in early prediction of patients with acute severe pancreatitis].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Apr;35(4):421-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221019-00930. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023. PMID: 37308200 Chinese.
-
Predicting Acute Onset of Heart Failure Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Feb;48(2):101480. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101480. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36336116 Review.
Cited by
-
Machine learning in the prevention of heart failure.Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Jan;30(1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10448-0. Epub 2024 Oct 7. Heart Fail Rev. 2025. PMID: 39373822 Review.
-
Construction of a Clinical Prediction Model for Complications After Femoral Head Replacement Surgery.J Clin Med Res. 2024 Dec;16(11):554-563. doi: 10.14740/jocmr6047. Epub 2024 Nov 11. J Clin Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39635335 Free PMC article.
-
Interpretable artificial intelligence model for predicting heart failure severity after acute myocardial infarction.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 12;25(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04818-1. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025. PMID: 40355836 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the risk of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction using an interpretable machine learning model.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 24;12:1444323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1444323. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 39925976 Free PMC article.
-
Advancements and challenges in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays: diagnostic, pathophysiological, and clinical perspectives.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Feb 7;63(7):1260-1278. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1090. Print 2025 Jun 26. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025. PMID: 39915924 Review.
References
-
- Hung J, Teng TH, Finn J, Knuiman M, Briffa T, Stewart S, Sanfilippo FM, Ridout S, Hobbs M. Trends from 1996 to 2007 in incidence and mortality outcomes of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study of 20,812 patients with first acute myocardial infarction in western Australia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(5):e000172. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000172. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sulo G, Igland J, Vollset SE, Nygard O, Ebbing M, Sulo E, Egeland GM, Tell GS. Heart failure complicating Acute myocardial infarction; burden and timing of occurrence: a Nation-wide analysis including 86 771 patients from the Cardiovascular Disease in Norway (CVDNOR) Project. J Am Heart Assoc 2016, 5(1). - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous