Longitudinal Auditory Benefit for Elderly Patients After Cochlear Implant for Bilateral Hearing Loss, Including Those Meeting Expanded Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Criteria
- PMID: 37621128
- PMCID: PMC10527933
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003983
Longitudinal Auditory Benefit for Elderly Patients After Cochlear Implant for Bilateral Hearing Loss, Including Those Meeting Expanded Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Criteria
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of patient age on longitudinal speech understanding outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in bilateral hearing loss.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Tertiary academic center.
Patients: One thousand one hundred five adult patients with bilateral hearing loss receiving a unilateral CI between 1987 and 2022InterventionsNone.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative speech recognition outcomes, including AzBio sentences, consonant-nucleus-consonant word, and Hearing in Noise Test in quiet were analyzed at short-term (<2 yr), medium-term (2-8 y), and long-term (>8 yr) term postoperative intervals.
Results: Eighty-six very elderly (>80 yr), 409 elderly (65-80 yr), and 709 nonelderly (18-65 yr) patients were included. Short-term postoperative AzBio scores demonstrated similar magnitude of improvement relative to preoperative scores in the very elderly (47.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.9-66.4), elderly (49.0; 95% CI, 39.2-58.8), and nonelderly (47.9; 95% CI, 35.4-60.4). Scores for those older than 80 years remained stable after 2 years after implant, but in those 80 years or younger, scores continued to improve for up to 8 years (elderly: 6.2 [95% CI, 1.5-12.4]; nonelderly: 9.9 [95% CI, 2.1-17.7]) after implantation. Similar patterns were observed for consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores. Across all age cohorts, patients with preoperative Hearing in Noise Test scores between 40 and 60% had similar scores to those with preoperative scores of less than 40%, at short-term (82.4, 78.9; 95% CI, -23.1 to 10.0), medium-term (77.2, 83.9; 95% CI, -15.4 to 8.2), or long-term (73.4, 71.2; 95% CI, -18.2 to 12.2) follow-up.
Conclusions: Patients older than 80 years gain significant and sustained auditory benefit after CI, including those meeting expanded Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service criteria for implantation. Patients younger than 80 years demonstrated continued improvement over longer periods than older patients, suggesting a role of central plasticity in mediating CI outcomes as a function of age.
Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Mikkola TM, et al. Self-Reported Hearing Status Is Associated with Lower Limb Physical Performance, Perceived Mobility, and Activities of Daily Living in Older Community-Dwelling Men and Women. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2015. 63(6): p. 1164–9. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Jiam NT, Li C, and Agrawal Y, Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope, 2016. 126(11): p. 2587–2596. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Abrams TE, et al. The relationship between hearing impairment and depression in older veterans. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2006. 54(9): p. 1475–7. - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        