Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 12;8(4):1068-1079.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.1108. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Systematic review: Validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy of the electrogustometer

Esther E Blijleven  1   2 , Denise Fuchten  1   2 , Max J Dullaart  1 , Robert J Stokroos  1   2 , Henricus G X M Thomeer  1   2 , Inge Wegner  3
Affiliations
Review

Systematic review: Validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy of the electrogustometer

Esther E Blijleven et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objective: What are the electrogustometer's (EGM) validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy in assessing taste sensation in adults compared to other taste tests?

Data sources: PubMed Medline, Elseviers's Embase, and the six databases of Cochrane Library.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on December 20, 2022, consisting of synonyms for EGM. We considered randomized controlled trials and observational studies with original data for inclusion if they included adults who underwent electrogustometry. Articles were excluded if no analysis regarding validity, reliability, or diagnostic accuracy had been performed or if these analyses could not be performed with the published data.

Results: Nineteen articles discussing 18 studies were included for data extraction. The included studies carry a high risk of bias. Overall, the association between a variety of reference taste tests and EGM was moderate or weak with correlation coefficients ranging from -0.51 to 0.40 with one outlier of -0.74 found in one study correlating EGM and taste solutions. Test-retest reliability was good with reported correlation coefficients between 0.78 and 1.0. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EGM in identifying abnormal taste function varied widely between the four studies on diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: The included studies in this review lack the required standards regarding study design to draw firm conclusions about the validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy of the EGM. Future research is needed to assess these measurement properties. Based on the reported results, we would not recommend using the EGM as a screening test for taste disturbance in clinical practice.

Level of evidence: NA.

Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; electrogustometry; reliability; systematic review; taste sensation; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prisma 2020 flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Krarup B. Electro‐gustometry: a method for clinical taste examinations. Acta Otolaryngol. 1958;49(4):294‐305. - PubMed
    1. Stillman JA, Morton RP, Hay KD, Ahmad Z, Goldsmith D. Electrogustometry: strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28(5):406‐410. - PubMed
    1. Pavlidis P, Schittek GA, Saratziotis A, Ferfeli M, Kekes G, Gouveris H. Electrogustometry: normative data for stimulus duration, tongue site and age decline. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021;46(4):767‐774. - PubMed
    1. Park YJ, Kim MJ, Kho HS. Relationships between subjective taste sensations and electrogustometry findings in patients with taste disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50(4):522‐529. - PubMed
    1. Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, et al. Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated “taste strips”. Rhinology. 2003;41(1):2‐6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources