Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 9:10:1220198.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1220198. eCollection 2023.

Modulation of digestibility of canine food using enzyme supplement: an in vitro simulated semi-dynamic digestion study

Affiliations

Modulation of digestibility of canine food using enzyme supplement: an in vitro simulated semi-dynamic digestion study

Swati Jadhav et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Digestibility and nutrient availability are important parameters when estimating the nutritional quality of pet food. We have developed a simulated semi-dynamic in vitro canine digestion model to evaluate the digestibility of dry extruded canine food. Canine food was assessed for digestible energy, dry matter digestibility, protein digestibility, non-fibrous carbohydrate (NFC) digestibility, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in the absence and presence of an enzyme blend (DigeSEB Super Pet). Enzyme blend supplementation in canine food was found to increase the dry matter digestibility (18.7%, p < 0.05), digestible energy (18.1%, p < 0.05), and protein digestibility (11%, p < 0.1) and reducing sugar release (106.3%, p < 0.005). The release of low molecular weight peptides (48.7%) and essential amino acids (15.6%) increased within 0.5 h of gastrointestinal digestion due to enzyme blend supplementation. Furthermore, the TAC of the digesta was also increased (8.1%, p < 0.005) in the canine food supplemented with enzyme blend. Overall, supplementation of enzyme blend in canine food is an effective strategy to enhance the food digestibility and nutrient availability for absorption.

Keywords: antioxidant; canine food; enzyme blend; macronutrient digestion; semi dynamic in vitro digestion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AR, SJ, MJ, and TG are paid employees of Advanced Enzyme Technologies, which has a corporate affiliation with Specialty Enzymes and Probiotics. Specialty Enzymes and Probiotics had no role in the study design and actual conduct of the study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Protein digestibility (%) and (B) Degree of hydrolysis (%) after gastric and gastro-intestinal digestion of the canine food in absence and presence of enzyme blend. (C) Increase in amino acid concentration (%) after gastro-intestinal (GI) digestion (digestion time—0.5, 1, and 2 h) of the canine food in presence of enzyme blend. (D) Increase in AUC (%) after gastric (G) and gastrointestinal (GI) digestion (digestion time—0.5, 1, 2, and 3 h) of the canine food in presence of enzyme blend. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine the p value. *, **, and *** represent significant difference at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.005, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Dry matter digestibility (%) and (B) Digestible energy (kcal/kg of sample) of the canine food in absence and presence of enzyme blend at gastric and gastro-intestinal phase. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation. Student’s t-test was used to determine p value. *represents a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total antioxidant capacity [ascorbic acid equivalent (mg) present in total digesta] after gastric (G) and gastro-intestinal (GI) digestion of the canine food in absence and presence of enzyme blend. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine p value. *represents a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Di Cerbo A, Morales-Medina JC, Palmieri B, Pezzuto F, Cocco R, Flores G, et al. . Functional foods in pet nutrition: focus on canines and cats. Res Vet Sci. (2017) 112:161–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.03.020, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daumas C, Paragon BM, Thorin C, Martin L, Dumon H, Ninet S, et al. . Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets. J Nutr Sci. (2014) 3:e63. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.65, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smeets-Peeters MJ, Minekus M, Havenaar R, Schaafsma G, Verstegen MW. Description of a dynamic in vitro model of the canine gastrointestinal tract and an evaluation of various transit times for protein and calcium. Altern Lab Anim. (1999) 27:935–49. doi: 10.1177/026119299902700608, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosch G, Beerda B, Hendriks WH, van der Poel AFB, Verstegen MWA. Impact of nutrition on canine behaviour: current status and possible mechanisms. Nutr Res Rev. (2007) 20:180–94. doi: 10.1017/S095442240781331X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gizzarelli M, Calabrò S, Vastolo A, Molinaro G, Balestrino I, Cutrignelli MI. Clinical findings in healthy canines fed with diets characterized by different carbohydrates sources. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:667318. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.667318, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources