Low-Load x High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After a Training Session
- PMID: 37622037
- PMCID: PMC10446953
- DOI: 10.70252/UIYF2129
Low-Load x High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After a Training Session
Abstract
Cell swelling caused by resistance training is proposed to provide an anabolic stimulus for muscle growth and it is believed that these effects are heightened with the use of low loads. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of two volume-equated resistance training (RT) protocols, low-load (LL) versus high-load (HL), on elbow flexor muscles thickness, arm circumference, and blood lactate concentration in well-trained individuals. Eight resistance-trained males performed the following two RT protocols involving unilateral elbow flexion of the dominant arm: i) LL, four sets with 50% 1 repetition-maximum [1 RM] and ii) HL, ten sets with 85% 1 RM until failure, and equated volume. Pre- and post-session measurements included muscle thickness of the elbow flexors (biceps brachii and brachialis), upper arm circumference, and blood lactate concentration. Significant pre- to post-session increases were found in both protocols for muscle thickness (F (1, 28) = 11.74, p = 0.0019), and blood lactate (F (1, 28) = 35.55, p < 0.0001); no statistically significant differences were observed between conditions, however, the magnitude of increases favored LL. Significant between-condition differences favoring LL were observed for total repetitions (p = 0.007), time under tension (p = 0.007), and training density (p = 0.007). These results suggest that LL training promotes superior post-session increases in muscle thickness, indicating that RT protocols with longer times under tension and densities are beneficial when the goal is to promote acute cell swelling.
Keywords: Muscle hypertrophy; muscle turgescence; skeletal muscle; ultrasound imaging.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training.J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):346-351. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454. J Strength Cond Res. 2022. PMID: 31895290
-
Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Well-Trained Men.J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2954-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958. J Strength Cond Res. 2015. PMID: 25853914
-
Acute cellular and molecular responses and chronic adaptations to low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance exercise in trained individuals.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Dec 1;131(6):1731-1749. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00464.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 23. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021. PMID: 34554017
-
The effects of upper body blood flow restriction training on muscles located proximal to the applied occlusive pressure: A systematic review with meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283309. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36952451 Free PMC article.
-
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):687-708. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009. PMID: 19204579 Review.
Cited by
-
Resistance Training to Muscle Failure with Variable Load Intensities: Implications for Post-Exercise Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability in Trained Men.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):2296. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082296. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38673569 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brown L, Weir J. Procedures recommendation I: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. J Exerc Physiol. 2001;4:1–21.
-
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
-
- DeWeese BH, Hornsby G, Stone M, Stone MH. The training process: Planning for strength-power training in track and field. Part 1: Theoretical aspects. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(4):308–17.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources