Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 2;25(9):euad244.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euad244.

Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal

Affiliations

Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal

Lucas Boersma et al. Europace. .

Abstract

The first edition of Europace journal in 1999 came right around the time of the landmark publication of the electrophysiologists from Bordeaux, establishing how elimination of ectopic activity from the pulmonary veins (PVs) resulted in a marked reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF). The past 25 years have seen an incredible surge in scientific interest to develop new catheters and energy sources to optimize durability and safety of ablation, as well as study the mechanisms for AF and devise ablation strategies. While ablation in the beginning was performed with classic 4 mm tip catheters that emitted radiofrequency (RF) energy to create tissue lesions, this evolved to using irrigation and contact force (CF) measurement while increasing power. Also, so-called single-shot devices were developed with balloons and arrays to create larger contiguous lesions, and energy sources changed from RF current to cryogenic ablation and more recently pulsed field ablation with electrical current. Although PV ablation has remained the basis for every AF ablation, it was soon recognized that this was not enough to cure all patients, especially those with non-paroxysmal AF. Standardized approaches for additional ablation targets have been used but have not been satisfactory in all patients so far. This led to highly technical mapping systems that are meant to unravel the drivers for the maintenance of AF. In the following sections, the development of energies, strategies, and tools is described with a focus on the contribution of Europace to publish the outcomes of studies that were done during the past 25 years.

Keywords: Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Cryoablation; Mapping; Pulsed field ablation; Radiofrequency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests to declare: L.B.: consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Adagio, and Acutus. J.G.A.: none declared. T.B.: none declared. M.D.: none declared. H.P.: none declared. F.S.: none declared. S.T.: none declared. A.V.: research grants from Medtronic, Biotronik, and Biosense Webster and advisory role for Medtronic, MedLumics, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution over 20 years towards a standardized and reproducible RF-PVI approach associated with an excellent efficacy/safety balance (the ‘CLOSE’ protocol; Europace 2018).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Different modalities to deliver high-power short-duration (HPSD) and very high-power very short-duration (vHPvSD) RF with re-introduction of temperature control in the era of irrigated RF ablation. The CLOSE protocol using HPSD and vHPvSD shortens the procedure time while preserving the excellent efficacy/safety balance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
New catheters to deliver ablation for AF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Top panels show MRI measurements at different stages before and after PFA. Middle panels show voltage maps before and acutely and chronically after PFA. Bottom panels show strain patterns before and acutely and chronically after PFA.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Examples of typical substrate ablation strategies beyond PVI. From: Eur Heart J, Volume 31, Issue 11, June 2010, Pages 1344–1356, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq041.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Posterior wall ablation strategy. (B) Ablation within the margins of the posterior box (representative of extensive or limited ablation within box). LSPV, left superior pulmonary vein; LIPV, left inferior pulmonary vein; RSPV, right superior pulmonary vein; RIPV, right inferior pulmonary vein. From Europace, Volume 19, Issue 12, December 2017, Pages 1958–1966, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw231.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A and B) See legend in the figure. From AFACART: Knecht, S., et al., Multicenter evaluation of non-invasive biatrial mapping for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: the AFACART study. Europace, 2017. 19(8): p. 1302–1309.
Figure 8
Figure 8
See legend in the figure. From Lin, T., et al., Focal impulse and rotor modulation using the novel 64-electrode basket catheter: electrogram characteristics of human rotors. Europace, 2015. 17(12): p. 1791–7.

References

    1. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou Get al. . Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998;339:659–66. - PubMed
    1. Boersma L. New energy sources and technologies for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Europace 2022;24:ii44–51. - PubMed
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C; for the ESC Scientific Document Group . 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42:373–498. - PubMed
    1. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale Aet al. . Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2010;303:333–40. - PubMed
    1. Jais P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, Daoud E, Khairy P, Subbia Ret al. . Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation 2008;118:2498–505. - PubMed

MeSH terms