Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):158.
doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080158.

Resilience as the Ability to Maintain Well-Being: An Allostatic Active Inference Model

Affiliations
Review

Resilience as the Ability to Maintain Well-Being: An Allostatic Active Inference Model

Christian E Waugh et al. J Intell. .

Abstract

Resilience is often characterized as the outcome of well-being maintenance despite threats to that well-being. We suggest that resilience can also be characterized as an emotional-intelligence-related ability to obtain this outcome. We formulate an allostatic active inference model that outlines the primary tools of this resilience ability as monitoring well-being, maintaining stable well-being beliefs while updating situational beliefs and flexibly prioritizing actions that are expected to lead to well-being maintenance or gathering the information needed to discern what those actions could be. This model helps to explain the role of positive emotions in resilience as well as how people high in resilience ability use regulatory flexibility in the service of maintaining well-being and provides a starting point for assessing resilience as an ability.

Keywords: active inference; allostasis; resilience; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The proposed relationship between maintenance of high well-being and magnitude of the threat to well-being as a function of resilience ability. Note that this graph only portrays the maintenance of high well-being, because low well-being would just represent low resilience ability regardless of the magnitude of threat to well-being.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An allostatic active interference model of well-being. To achieve the goal of high well-being, individuals select actions that promote positive well-being changes and information gain, known as minimizing expected free energy. During this action selection, an internal model estimates the likelihood of well-being change outcomes, allowing the individual to make predictions. After performing the action, individuals observe how the actions impacted their well-being and must update their predictive model to minimize the degree to which the model predicts the wrong outcome in the future. This prediction error along with a valuation of parsimony is known as the variational free energy (VFE). Individuals with high resilience ability maintain stably positive global beliefs about well-being in the face of threats and flexibly regulate when to update and when to maintain situational beliefs about well-being.

References

    1. Armstrong Andrew R., Galligan Roslyn F., Critchley Christine R. Emotional intelligence and psychological resilience to negative life events. Special Issue on Personality and Economics. 2011;51:331–36. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.025. - DOI
    1. Barrett Lisa Feldman. The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2017;12:1–23. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bechtoldt Myriam N., Schneider Vanessa K. Predicting stress from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings: Emotional intelligence and testosterone jointly predict cortisol reactivity. Emotion. 2016;16:815. doi: 10.1037/emo0000134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Block Jack, Kremen Adam M. IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70:349–61. - PubMed
    1. Bonanno George A. Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events? American Psychologist. 2004;59:20–28. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources