Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 4;16(2):219-226.
doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad076.

Concordance of emergency department physicians' decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Concordance of emergency department physicians' decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study

Johannes Heck et al. Int Health. .

Abstract

Background: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study.

Results: The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25-35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected.

Conclusions: ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount.

Keywords: drug safety; drug–drug interactions; emergency department; human immunodeficiency virus; internal medicine; post-exposure prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of patients. Of 11 246 screened patients, 113 met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. ED: emergency department; PEP: post-exposure prophylaxis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stanley K, Lora M, Merjavy S et al. HIV prevention and treatment: the evolving role of the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(4):562–72. - PubMed
    1. Sani F, Faragon JJ, Egan DJ. Managing the HIV-infected adult patient in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2021;23(7):1–24. - PubMed
    1. Beekmann SE, Henderson DK. Prevention of human immunodeficiency virus and AIDS: Postexposure prophylaxis (including health care workers). Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(4):601–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrion AJ, Miles JD, Mosley JF et al. Prevention strategies against HIV transmission: A proactive approach. J Pharm Pract. 2018;31(1):82–90. - PubMed
    1. Deutsche AIDS-Gesellschaft . Deutsch-Österreichische Leitlinie zur medikamentösen Postexpositionsprophylaxe (PEP) nach HIV-Exposition (Version 2022). AWMF-Register Nr. 055/004. 2022.

Substances