Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 26;12(8):1237.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081237.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline and Comparators against Bacterial Isolates Collected Globally from Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: ATLAS Program 2019-2020

Affiliations

In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline and Comparators against Bacterial Isolates Collected Globally from Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: ATLAS Program 2019-2020

Alona Kuraieva et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) collected in Africa/Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America from 2019-2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria. All the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Across all regions, ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, susceptibility 89.5-93.7%) isolates. Susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and tigecycline was ≥94.1% in MSSA and MRSA isolates. Against β-hemolytic streptococci isolates, ceftaroline demonstrated very potent activity (MIC90 0.008-0.03 mg/L) across all regions. All β-hemolytic streptococci isolates were susceptible to linezolid, penicillin, and vancomycin (MIC90 0.06-2 mg/L). Among the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-negative Enterobacterales tested (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and K. oxytoca), susceptibility to ceftaroline was high (88.2-98.6%) in all regions. All ESBL-negative Enterobacterales were susceptible to aztreonam. Potent activity was observed for amikacin, cefepime, and meropenem (94.1-100%) against these isolates. Overall, ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against isolates of pathogens causing SSTIs. Continuous surveillance of global and regional susceptibility patterns is needed to guide appropriate treatment options against these pathogens.

Keywords: antimicrobial activity; antimicrobial resistance; ceftaroline; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; skin and soft tissue infections; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.U., A.K., and G.C.-C. are employees of Pfizer and may hold stock/stock options with Pfizer. P.K. declares no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moffarah A.S., Al Mohajer M., Hurwitz B.L., Armstrong D.G. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016;4:691–708. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0014-2015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tognetti L., Martinelli C., Berti S., Hercogova J., Lotti T., Leoncini F., Moretti S. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections: Review of the epidemiology, microbiology, aetiopathogenesis and treatment: A collaboration between dermatologists and infectivologists. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2012;26:931–941. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04416.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilcox M.H., Dryden M. Update on the epidemiology of healthcare-acquired bacterial infections: Focus on complicated skin and skin structure infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021;76:iv2–iv8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab350. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sartelli M., Guirao X., Hardcastle T.C., Kluger Y., Boermeester M.A., Raşa K., Ansaloni L., Coccolini F., Montravers P., Abu-Zidan F.M., et al. 2018 WSES/SIS-E consensus conference: Recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2018;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0219-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giesey R., Mehrmal S., Uppal P., Delost G. The Global Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Disease: A Longitudinal Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study From 1990-2017. Skin. 2021;5:125–136. doi: 10.25251/skin.5.2.7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources