Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 28;13(8):1646.
doi: 10.3390/life13081646.

Diagnostic and Communication Challenges in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic and Communication Challenges in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening

Joan Kathleen DeCelie-Germana et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

As of December 2009, cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) is performed in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Widespread implementation of CF newborn screening (CFNBS) in the US and internationally has brought about new and varied challenges. Immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) remains the first, albeit imperfect, biomarker used universally in the screening process. Advances in genetic testing have provided an opportunity for newborn screening programs to add CFTR sequencing tiers to their algorithms. This in turn will enable earlier identification of babies with CF and improve longer-term outcomes through prompt treatment and intervention. CFTR sequencing has led to the ability to identify infants with CF from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds more equitably while also identifying an increasing proportion of infants with inconclusive diagnoses. Using the evolution of the New York State CF newborn screening program as a guide, this review outlines the basic steps in a universal CF newborn screening program, considers how to reduce bias, highlights challenges, offers guidance to address these challenges and provides recommendations for future consideration.

Keywords: CF diagnostic challenges; IRT; cystic fibrosis; ethnic diversity; newborn screen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of the New York State cystic fibrosis newborn screening algorithm from inception until present. Courtesy of Denise Kay, NYSDOH (New York State Department of Health).

References

    1. Sontag M.K., Miller J.I., McKasson S., Gaviglio A., Martiniano S.L., West R., Vazquez M., Ren C.L., Farrell P.M., McColley S.A., et al. Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: A Qualitative Study of Successes and Challenges from Universal Screening in the United States. Int. J. Neonatal. Screen. 2022;8:38. doi: 10.3390/ijns8030038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld M., Ostrenga J., Cromwell E.A., Magaret A., Szczesniak R., Fink A., Schechter M.S., Faro A., Ren C.L., Morgan W., et al. Real-world Associations of US Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Programs with Nutritional and Pulmonary Outcomes. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176:990–999. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2674. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crossley J.R., Elliott R.B., Smith P.A. Dried-blood spot screening for cystic fibrosis in the newborn. Lancet. 1979;1:472–474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)90825-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kharrazi M., Sacramento C., Comeau A.M., Hale J.E., Caggana M., Kay D.M., Lee R., Reilly B., Thompson J.D., Nasr S.Z., et al. Missed Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Cases due to Immunoreactive Trypsinogen Levels below Program Cutoffs: A National Survey of Risk Factors. Int. J. Neonatal. Screen. 2022;8:58. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hammond K.B., Abman S.H., Sokol R.J., Accurso F.J. Efficacy of statewide neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis by assay of trypsinogen concentrations. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:769–774. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109123251104. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources