Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns
- PMID: 37632862
- PMCID: PMC10334893
- DOI: 10.2196/34111
Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns
Abstract
Background: Crowdfunding for medical costs is becoming increasingly popular. Few previous studies have described the fundraising characteristics and qualities associated with success.
Objective: This study aimed to characterize and investigate the qualities associated with successful dermatological fundraisers.
Methods: This cross-sectional study of dermatological GoFundMe campaigns collected data, including demographic variables, thematic variables using an inductive qualitative method, and quantitative information. Linear regression examined the qualities associated with success, which are defined based on funds raised when controlling for campaign goals. Logistic regression was used to examine qualities associated with extremely successful campaigns, defined as those raising >1.5 times the IQR. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.
Results: A total of 2008 publicly available campaigns at the time of data collection were evaluated. Nonmodifiable factors associated with greater success included male gender, age 20-40 years, and White race. Modifiable factors associated with success included more updates posted to the campaign page, non-self-identity of the campaign creator, mention of a chronic condition, and smiling in campaign profile photographs.
Conclusions: Understanding the modifiable factors of medical crowdfunding may inform future campaigns, and nonmodifiable factors may have policy implications for improving health care equity and financing. Crowdfunding for medical disease treatment may have potential implications for medical privacy and exacerbation of existing health care disparities. This study was limited to publicly available GoFundMe campaigns. Potential limitations for this study include intercoder variability, misclassification bias because of the data abstraction process, and prioritization of campaigns based on the proprietary GoFundMe algorithm.
Keywords: GoFundMe; crowdfunding; crowdsourcing; financial burden; fundraising; health equity; medical expenses; social media.
©Erica Mark, Mira Sridharan, Brian Florenzo, Olivia L Schenck, Mary-Margaret B Noland, John S Barbieri, Jules B Lipoff. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 22.04.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Angraal S, Zachariah AG, Raaisa R, Khera R, Rao P, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA. Evaluation of internet-based crowdsourced fundraising to cover health care costs in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2033157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33157. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jam... 2774737 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- GoFundMe: #1 fundraising platform for crowdfunding. [2021-06-22]. https://www.gofundme.com/
-
- Kenworthy N, Dong Z, Montgomery A, Fuller E, Berliner L. A cross-sectional study of social inequities in medical crowdfunding campaigns in the United States. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229760. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229760 PONE-D-19-22086 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Joseph Mattingly 2nd T, Li K, Ng A, Ton-Nu TL, Owens J. Exploring patient-reported costs related to hepatitis C on the medical crowdfunding page GoFundMe®. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021;5(2):245–50. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00232-9. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00232-9.10.1007/s41669-020-00232-9 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources