Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;52(9):102652.
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102652. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

Clinician communication after discovery of a soft marker of aneuploidy during pregnancy: A mixed methods assessment of a communication workshop

Affiliations

Clinician communication after discovery of a soft marker of aneuploidy during pregnancy: A mixed methods assessment of a communication workshop

Katherine M Johnson et al. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Soft markers of aneuploidy are common findings on obstetric ultrasounds but disclosure often increases patient anxiety. It is unknown whether communication training affects patient experience of soft marker disclosure. Our objective was to evaluate clinician experience of a simulation-based communication workshop and assess workshop influence on patient anxiety, understanding, and perception of communication quality.

Methods: We implemented a communication workshop for clinicians at an academic institution in 2019, and assessed clinician anxiety and confidence with counseling before and after. To assess effect of the workshop on patients, we surveyed pregnant people before and after workshop implementation for whom an echogenic intracardiac focus, choroid plexus cyst, or urinary tract dilation was identified. The primary outcome was anxiety. Some respondents completed a semi-structured interview. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Twelve clinicians participated. Twenty-one out of 49 eligible patients (43%) completed a survey before the workshop and 40 out of 90 eligible patients (44%) completed a survey after. The risk of high anxiety after was similar to before the workshop (aRR 1.7, 95% CI 0.6-4.2). Twenty patients were recruited for an interview. Qualitative analysis revealed that patients' backgrounds, emotional impact of the conversation and clinician manner influenced perception of communication quality.

Conclusion: While a single clinician workshop did not affect patient anxiety, clinician manner and personalization play a large role in perception of counseling about soft markers of aneuploidy.

Keywords: Communication skills; Information handling; Obstetrics and gynecology; Simulation; Soft markers of aneuploidy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Michele Hacker reports financial support was provided by National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

References

    1. Nyberg DA, Souter VL, El-Bastawissi A, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy DA. Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:1053–63. - PubMed
    1. Winter TC, Rose NC. How to Integrate Cell-Free DNA Screening With Sonographic Markers for Aneuploidy: An Update. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:906–12. 10.2214/AJR.17.18343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahman A, Runestam K, Sarkadi A. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women’s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81:87–93. 10.1016/jpec.2009.12.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chasen ST, Razavi AS. Echogenic intracardiac foci: disclosure and the rate of amniocentesis in low-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:377.e1–3. 10.1016/jajog.2013.05.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee MJ, Roman AS, Lusskin S, Chen D, Dulay A, Funai EF, et al. Maternal anxiety and ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in a multiethnic population. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:40–5. 10.1002/pd.1618. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources