Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
- PMID: 37634145
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock despite a lack of evidence regarding its effect on mortality.
Methods: In this multicenter trial, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early ECLS plus usual medical treatment (ECLS group) or usual medical treatment alone (control group). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Safety outcomes included bleeding, stroke, and peripheral vascular complications warranting interventional or surgical therapy.
Results: A total of 420 patients underwent randomization, and 417 patients were included in final analyses. At 30 days, death from any cause had occurred in 100 of 209 patients (47.8%) in the ECLS group and in 102 of 208 patients (49.0%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.19; P = 0.81). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 12) in the ECLS group and 5 days (interquartile range, 3 to 9) in the control group (median difference, 1 day; 95% CI, 0 to 2). The safety outcome consisting of moderate or severe bleeding occurred in 23.4% of the patients in the ECLS group and in 9.6% of those in the control group (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.95); peripheral vascular complications warranting intervention occurred in 11.0% and 3.8%, respectively (relative risk, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31 to 6.25).
Conclusions: In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with planned early revascularization, the risk of death from any cause at the 30-day follow-up was not lower among the patients who received ECLS therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and others; ECLS-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03637205.).
Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
In acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock, ECLS did not reduce 30-d all-cause mortality.Ann Intern Med. 2023 Dec;176(12):JC135. doi: 10.7326/J23-0093. Epub 2023 Dec 5. Ann Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 38048577
-
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):189-190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312854. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197832 No abstract available.
-
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312854. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197833 No abstract available.
-
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312854. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197834 No abstract available.
-
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. Reply.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):190-191. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312854. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197835 No abstract available.
-
Who Benefits from Mechanical Circulatory Support?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;210(7):931. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0087RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39133507 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical