Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI
- PMID: 37634188
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI
Abstract
Background: Data regarding clinical outcomes after optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with angiography-guided PCI are limited.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with medication-treated diabetes or complex coronary-artery lesions to undergo OCT-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. A final blinded OCT procedure was performed in patients in the angiography group. The two primary efficacy end points were the minimum stent area after PCI as assessed with OCT and target-vessel failure at 2 years, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization. Safety was also assessed.
Results: The trial was conducted at 80 sites in 18 countries. A total of 2487 patients underwent randomization: 1233 patients were assigned to undergo OCT-guided PCI, and 1254 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The minimum stent area after PCI was 5.72±2.04 mm2 in the OCT group and 5.36±1.87 mm2 in the angiography group (mean difference, 0.36 mm2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.51; P<0.001). Target-vessel failure within 2 years occurred in 88 patients in the OCT group and in 99 patients in the angiography group (Kaplan-Meier estimates, 7.4% and 8.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.19; P = 0.45). OCT-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient in the OCT group and in 2 patients in the angiography group. Stent thrombosis within 2 years occurred in 6 patients (0.5%) in the OCT group and in 17 patients (1.4%) in the angiography group.
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing PCI, OCT guidance resulted in a larger minimum stent area than angiography guidance, but there was no apparent between-group difference in the percentage of patients with target-vessel failure at 2 years. (Funded by Abbott; ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03507777.).
Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
New insights into OCT-guided PCI.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Nov;20(11):720. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00930-x. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37670011 No abstract available.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):185. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313256. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197825 No abstract available.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):185-186. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313256. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197826 No abstract available.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):186. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313256. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197827 No abstract available.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI. Reply.N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):186-187. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313256. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38197828 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous