Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Oct:191:109950.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109950. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

The association of arterial blood pressure waveform-derived area duty cycle with intra-arrest hemodynamics and cardiac arrest outcomes

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The association of arterial blood pressure waveform-derived area duty cycle with intra-arrest hemodynamics and cardiac arrest outcomes

Tommy E Rappold et al. Resuscitation. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: Develop a novel, physiology-based measurement of duty cycle (Arterial Blood Pressure-Area Duty Cycle [ABP-ADC]) and evaluate the association of ABP-ADC with intra-arrest hemodynamics and patient outcomes.

Methods: This was a secondary retrospective study of prospectively collected data from the ICU-RESUS trial (NCT02837497). Invasive arterial waveform data were used to derive ABP-ADC. The primary exposure was ABP-ADC group (<30%; 30-35%; >35%). The primary outcome was systolic blood pressure (sBP). Secondary outcomes included intra-arrest physiologic goals, CPR quality targets, and patient outcomes. In an exploratory analysis, adjusted splines and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine an optimal ABP-ADC associated with improved hemodynamics and outcomes using a multivariable model.

Results: Of 1129 CPR events, 273 had evaluable arterial waveform data. Mean age is 2.9 years + 4.9 months. Mean ABP-ADC was 32.5% + 5.0%. In univariable analysis, higher ABP-ADC was associated with lower sBP (p < 0.01) and failing to achieve sBP targets (p < 0.01). Other intra-arrest physiologic parameters, quality metrics, and patient outcomes were similar across ABP-ADC groups. Using spline/ROC analysis and clinical judgement, the optimal ABP-ADC cut point was set at 33%. On multivariable analysis, sBP was significantly higher (point estimate 13.18 mmHg, CI95 5.30-21.07, p < 0.01) among patients with ABP-ADC < 33%. Other intra-arrest physiologic and patient outcomes were similar.

Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort, a lower ABP-ADC was associated with higher sBPs during CPR. Although ABP-ADC was not associated with outcomes, further studies are needed to define the interactions between CPR mechanics and intra arrest patient physiology.

Keywords: Cardiac Arrest; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. ABP-ADC Beat-to-beat Calculation.
For each chest compression cycle, i, the peak arterial blood pressure value, pi, which takes place at the peak time tp,i, corresponds to the systolic blood pressure. The start time for the compression cycle was similarly determined. The start time ts,i for compression i was 60% between the peak time tp,i of compression cycle i and the peak time of compression cycle i1,tp,i1, as shown in Equation 1: ts,i=tp,i1+0.6*tp,itp,i1 The arterial waveform for one compression cycle was bounded by the compression’s start point ts,i and peak pi and with the start time of the next compression ts,i+1. The cycle height was pisi and the width was ts,i+1ts,i. With the rectangle generated by these coordinates, ABP-ADC was calculated by summing the area under the ABP waveform and dividing by the total rectangular area: ADCi=ts,its,i+1maxABP(t)si,0Δtpisi*ts,i+1ts,i
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Distribution of Arterial Blood Pressure – Area Duty Cycle (ABP-ADC) for each CPR event

References

    1. Holmberg MJ, Ross CE, Fitzmaurice GM, et al. Annual Incidence of Adult and Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Jul 9 2019;12(7):e005580. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan RW, Kirschen MP, Kilbaugh TJ, Sutton RM, Topjian AA. Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the United States: A Review. JAMA Pediatr. Mar 1 2021;175(3):293–302. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmberg MJ, Wiberg S, Ross CE, et al. Trends in Survival After Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States. Circulation. Oct 22 2019;140(17):1398–1408. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, et al. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. Oct 20 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S469–S523. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. Nov 2 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S685–705. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types