Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 27;23(1):598.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03312-4.

Treatment effects after maxillary expansion using invisalign first system vs. acrylic splint expander in mixed dentition: a prospective cohort study

Lanxin Lu #  1   2   3 , Lingling Zhang #  1   2   3   4   5 , Chengri Li  1   2   3 , Fang Yi  1   2   3 , Lei Lei  1   2   3 , Yanqin Lu  6   7   8   9
Affiliations

Treatment effects after maxillary expansion using invisalign first system vs. acrylic splint expander in mixed dentition: a prospective cohort study

Lanxin Lu et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Invisalign First System (First) is a new type of orthodontic appliance for maxillary arch expansion in mixed dentition children. Till now, few studies have evaluated the expansion effects of First versus other appliances. What's more, most studies of arch expansion did not include a natural group to rule out growth effects. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the dental and dentoalveolar effects using First or acrylic splint rapid maxillary expander (RME) in adolescents excluding growth factors.

Materials and methods: After screening by strict inclusion criteria and propensity score matching (PSM), fifty-one patients were included: First group (n = 17), RME group (n = 17), and natural growth (NG) group (n = 17). Nine indicators including dental arch width, dentoalveolar arch width, and inclination of the molars were measured on digital dental casts at baseline (T0) and six-month follow-up (T1). Paired t-tests were used for intra-group results, and two-sample independent t-tests were used for inter-group comparisons.

Results: There was no significant increase in all indicators within six months in the NG group (p > 0.05). In the First group and RME group, all width indicators were significantly increased after treatment (p < 0.05). The RME group exhibited greater expansion than the First group in intercanine width, first interpremolar width, second interdeciduous molar width, first intermolar width, arch perimeter, intercanine dentoalveolar width, intermolar dentoalveolar width, and inclination of the molars (p < 0.05). Whereas, there was no significant difference in arch depth between the two treated groups.

Conclusions: Both First and RME can expand the maxillary arch in mixed dentition. In case of mild to moderate maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD), Invisalign First System could be a reasonable option. RME shows significant better efficiency of dental arch expansion than First, recommended for patients with severe MTD.

Trial registration: This prospective study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (01/02/2022, registration number: ChiCTR2200056220). The trial was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Hunan Xiangya Stomatological Hospital Central South University (20,200,088), and informed consent was obtained from all subjects and their legal guardian(s).

Keywords: Invisalign First System; Maxillary arch expansion; Mixed dentition; Natural growth; Propensity score matching; RME.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Arch width linear measurements. A. Dental indicators: (a) 53–63 width; (b) 14–24 width; (c) 55–65 width; (d) 16–26 width. B. Dentoalveolar indicators: (e) intercanine dentoalveolar width; (f) intermolar dentoalveolar width. C. Dentoalveolar marker points
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A: Arch depth (from a to b). B: Arch perimeter (from c to f). C: Molar inclination
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Seif-Eldin NF, Elkordy SA, Fayed MS, et al. Transverse skeletal Effects of Rapid Maxillary expansion in pre and post pubertal subjects: a systematic review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(3):467–77. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levrini L, Carganico A, Abbate L. Maxillary expansion with clear aligners in the mixed dentition: a preliminary study with Invisalign® First system. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):125–8. - PubMed
    1. O’Grady PW, McNamara JA, Jr, Baccetti T, et al. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(2):202–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geran RG, McNamara JA, Jr, Baccetti T, et al. A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):631–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huynh T, Kennedy DB, Joondeph DR, et al. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(3):331–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.026. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources