Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;42(2):415-428.
doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230101. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

The Global Andrology Forum (GAF): Structure, Roles, Functioning and Outcomes: An Online Model for Collaborative Research

Affiliations

The Global Andrology Forum (GAF): Structure, Roles, Functioning and Outcomes: An Online Model for Collaborative Research

Walid El Ansari et al. World J Mens Health. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: There are no published examples of a global online research collaborative in andrology. We describe the development, profile and member characteristics of the first consortium of this type, the Global Andrology Forum (GAF).

Materials and methods: An online survey sent to all GAF members collected demographic information (sex, age, experience, academic title, degrees, country, specialty, profession). It also tapped data on members' characteristics e.g., skills in research, software and statistics; preferred activities; time commitments; expected roles; and interest in participating in research, in GAF's scientific activities and collaborative online research. The findings were analyzed and tabulated. We outline members' demographic and professional characteristics and scientific achievements to date. A narrative approach outlined GAF's structure and functioning.

Results: A total of 418 out of 540 members completed the survey and were included in the analysis (77.4% response rate). The sample comprised mainly urologists (34.2%) and a third of the respondents had practiced for >15 years (33.3%). Up to 86.1% of the members expressed interest in being actively engaged in writing scientific articles. A third of the sample (37.1%) could dedicate 4 to 6 hours/week. Few respondents reported skills in statistics and artwork (2.6% and 1.9% respectively). Members were assigned to specific roles based on their expertise and experiences. Collaborative working ensured the timely completion of projects while maintaining quality. For outcomes, GAF published 29 original articles within one year of its creation, with authors from 48 countries spanning topics that included varicocele, sperm DNA damage, oxidative stress, semen analysis and male infertility, oocyte/embryo, and laboratory issues of assisted reproductive technique (ART) and male infertility evaluation.

Conclusions: GAF is a successful global online andrology research model. A healthy number of scientific articles have been published. Given such effectiveness, adopting the GAF model could be useful for other disciplines that wish to create and coordinate successful international online research groups.

Keywords: Andrology; Education; Group structure; Organizations; Research; Surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The Global Andrology Forum (GAF): member roles and duties.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. A snapshot of the Global Andrology Forum (GAF): Organization, structure, functional teams and communication lines.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Geographical distribution of members.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Members’ professional backgrounds and years of experience. IVF: in vitro fertilization.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Members’ preferred activities.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Hours devoted per week to the Global Andrology Forum (GAF) research projects. IVF: in vitro fertilization.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Members’ expectation of their roles in research projects.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Other skills of the respondents.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. Possible hours devoted to administrative activities per week.

References

    1. Isidori A. [The history of modern andrology] Med Secoli. 2001;13:255–268. Italian. - PubMed
    1. Hong K, Xu QQ, Zhao YP, Gu YQ, Jiang H, Wang XF, et al. Andrology in China: current status and 10 years' progress. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:512–518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calogero AE, Cannarella R, Agarwal A, Hamoda TAA, Rambhatla A, Saleh R, et al. The renaissance of male infertility management in the golden age of andrology. World J Mens Health. 2023;41:237–254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schirren C. Andrology--development and future. Critical remarks after 45 years of medical practice. Andrologia. 1996;28:137–140. - PubMed
    1. Dellis A, Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Why should I do research? Is it a waste of time? Arab J Urol. 2014;12:68–70. - PMC - PubMed