Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 21:3:100065.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100065. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Toward practical causal epidemiology

Affiliations

Toward practical causal epidemiology

Louis Anthony Cox Jr. Glob Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Population attributable fraction (PAF), probability of causation, burden of disease, and related quantities derived from relative risk ratios are widely used in applied epidemiology and health risk analysis to quantify the extent to which reducing or eliminating exposures would reduce disease risks. This causal interpretation conflates association with causation. It has sometimes led to demonstrably mistaken predictions and ineffective risk management recommendations. Causal artificial intelligence (CAI) methods developed at the intersection of many scientific disciplines over the past century instead use quantitative high-level descriptions of networks of causal mechanisms (typically represented by conditional probability tables or structural equations) to predict the effects caused by interventions. We summarize these developments and discuss how CAI methods can be applied to realistically imperfect data and knowledge - e.g., with unobserved (latent) variables, missing data, measurement errors, interindividual heterogeneity in exposure-response functions, and model uncertainty. We recommend that CAI methods can help to improve the conceptual foundations and practical value of epidemiological calculations by replacing association-based attributions of risk to exposures or other risk factors with causal predictions of the changes in health effects caused by interventions.

Keywords: Causal artificial intelligence; Causality; Population attributable fraction; Probability of causation; Risk analysis; Statistical methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A Bayesian network (BN) structure for air pollutants (pm2.5 = fine particulate matter, pm10 = coarse particulate matter, o3 = ozone, so2 = sulfur dioxide, no2 = nitrogen dioxide, co = carbon monoxide); cardiovascular-pulmonary disease mortality for people over age 60 (CVD60); and related weather and geographic variables (e.g., wd = wind direction, t2m = 2 m temperature, ws = wind speed, etc.). Source: [64].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Seeing vs. doing. How y values of the individual data points would change if their x values were reduced by a stated amount cannot be determined from the data. Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox
Unlabelled Image

References

    1. Abraham S., Sahibzada S., Hewson K., Laird T., Abraham R., Pavic A., et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli among Australian chickens in the absence of fluoroquinolone use. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(8) doi: 10.1128/AEM.02765-19. Apr 1. e02765–19. PMID: 32033955; PMCID: PMC7117913. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ankan A., Wortel I.M.N., Textor J. Testing graphical causal models using the R package “dagitty”. CurrProtoc. 2021 Feb;1(2) doi: 10.1002/cpz1.45. 33592130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apley D.W., Zhu J. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models. J R Stat Soc. 2020;82:869–1164.
    1. Athey S., Tibshirani J., Wager S. Generalized random forests. Ann Stat. 2019;47(2):1148–1178. doi: 10.1214/18-AOS1709. - DOI
    1. Bareinboim E., Pearl J. Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2013. Causal transportability with limited experiments; pp. 95–101.ftp://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r408.pdf

LinkOut - more resources