Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10:10:1220213.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1220213. eCollection 2023.

The kinetics of glutathione in the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets supplemented with different doses of dietary reduced glutathione

Affiliations

The kinetics of glutathione in the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets supplemented with different doses of dietary reduced glutathione

Yuhuang Hou et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the kinetics of dietary GSH in the gastrointestinal tract and the effect of GSH on the intestinal redox status of weaned piglets. Forty-eight piglets with an average age of 26 days and an average body weight of 7.7 kg were used in this study. The piglets were divided into three treatment groups including the control group with a basal diet (CON) and two GSH groups with a basal diet supplemented with 0.1% GSH (LGSH) and 1.0% GSH (HGSH), respectively. The basal diet did not contain any GSH. The experiment lasted for 14 days, with eight animals sampled from each group on d5 and 14. The parts of 0-5%, 5-75%, and 75-100% of the length of the small intestine were assigned to SI1, SI2, and SI3. The results showed that GSH almost completely disappeared from the digesta at SI2. However, no difference in the GSH level in mucosa, liver, and blood erythrocytes was found. The level of cysteine (CYS) in SI1 digesta was significantly higher in HGSH than CON and LGSH on d14, and similar findings were observed for cystine (CYSS) in SI3 digesta on d5. The CYSS level in HGSH was also significantly higher than LGSH in the stomach on d14, while no CYS or CYSS was detected in the stomach for control animals, indicating the breakdown of GSH to CYS already occurred in the stomach. Irrespective of the dietary treatment, the CYS level on d14 and the CYSS level on d5 and 14 were increased when moving more distally into the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, the mucosal CYS level was significantly increased at SI1 in the LGSH and HGSH group compared with CON on d5. Glutathione disulfide (GSSG) was recovered in the diets and digesta from the LGSH and HGSH group, which could demonstrate the auto-oxidation of GSH. It is, therefore, concluded that GSH supplementation could not increase the small intestinal mucosal GSH level of weaned piglets, and this could potentially relate to the kinetics of GSH in the digestive tract, where GSH seemed to be prone to the breakdown to CYS and CYSS and the auto-oxidation to GSSG.

Keywords: different doses; gastrointestinal tract; glutathione; kinetics; weaned piglet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of supplementary GSH on BW of piglets on d0, d5, and d14 from ad libitum fed basal diet (CON), basal diet with 1 g/kg GSH (LGSH), and basal diet with 10 g/kg GSH (HGSH; n = 7–8). BW, body weight; ns, no significance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glutathione and cysteine redox system in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets on d5 from ad libitum fed basal diet (CON), basal diet with 1 g/kg GSH (LGSH), and basal diet with 10 g/kg GSH (HGSH; n = 7–8). The results are presented as least squares means with SEM. Significance levels of main effects and interaction terms are indicated: pposition = the effect of different sites (stomach, SI1, SI2, and SI3) on reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), cysteine (CYS), and cystine (CYSS) concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factors, pGSH = the effect of GSH treatment on GSH, GSSG, CYS, and CYSS concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factor, pinteraction = the effect of interaction of different sites of the gastrointestinal tract and GSH treatment on GSH, GSSG, CYS, and CYSS concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factors. (A) GSH concentrations on d5; (B) GSSG concentrations on d5; (C) GSH/GSSG ratios on d5; (D) CYS concentrations on d5; (E) CYSS concentrations on d5; and (F) CYS/CYSS ratios on d5. *Represents the significant difference among groups from the effect of GSH treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Glutathione and cysteine redox system in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets on d14, from ad libitum fed basal diet (CON), basal diet with 1 g/kg GSH (LGSH), and basal diet with 10 g/kg GSH (HGSH; n = 7–8). Results are presented as least squares means with SEM. Significance levels of main effects and interaction terms are indicated: pposition = the effect of different sites (stomach, SI1, SI2, and SI3) on reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), cysteine (CYS), and cystine (CYSS) concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factors, pGSH = the effect of GSH treatment on GSH, GSSG, CYS, and CYSS concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factors, pinteraction = the effect of interaction of different sites of the gastrointestinal tract and GSH treatment on GSH, GSSG, CYS, and CYSS concentrations and ratios of GSH/GSSG and CYS/CYSS in the gastrointestinal tract across the other factors. (A) GSH concentrations on d14; (B) GSSG concentrations on d14; (C) GSH/GSSG ratios on d14; (D) CYS concentrations on d14; (E) CYSS concentrations on d14; and (F) CYS/CYSS ratios on d14. *Represents the significant difference among groups from the effect of GSH treatment (p ≤ 0.05).

Similar articles

References

    1. Noctor G, Queval G, Mhamdi A, Chaouch S, Foyer CH. Glutathione. Arabidopsis Book. (2011) 9:e0142. 10.1199/tab.0142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaplowitz N, Aw TY, Ookhtens M. The regulation of hepatic glutathione. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (1985) 25:715–44. 10.1146/annurev.pa.25.040185.003435 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lu SC. Regulation of glutathione synthesis. Mol Aspects Med. (2009) 30:42–59. 10.1016/j.mam.2008.05.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giustarini D, Tsikas D, Colombo G, Milzani A, Dalle-Donne I, Fanti P, et al. . Pitfalls in the analysis of the physiological antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and its disulfide (GSSG) in biological samples: an elephant in the room. J Chromatogr B. (2016) 1019:21–8. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.02.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franco R, Cidlowski J. Apoptosis and glutathione: beyond an antioxidant. Cell Death Differ. (2009) 16:1303–14. 10.1038/cdd.2009.107 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources