Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits
- PMID: 37636620
- PMCID: PMC10447802
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1
Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits
Abstract
Objective: The main objective of the study was to compare four measures of TOMASS (number of bites, number of masticatory cycles, number of swallowing and total time taken) across brands of Marie biscuits and gender.
Methodology: The study employed a cross-sectional design with nonrandomized convenience sampling. A total of 60 participants (30 females and 30 males) were recruited for the study in the age range of 18 to 26 years. Prior to enrolment in the study, the participants were screened for potential speech and swallowing issues. Two commercially available crackers (biscuits) in India, Sunfeast Marie Light and Britannia Marie Gold were used. Video recordings of the participants eating the biscuits were analyzed to document four measures of TOMASS.
Results: The mean values obtained on all the measures for males were lesser than mean values for females for both the biscuits. Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant difference across number of swallows and total time taken across gender. There were no significant differences across biscuits on the four TOMASS measures.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the TOMASS measures were near similar for both brands of Marie biscuits. Thus, any of these two brands of Marie could be used for clinical swallow evaluation. However, gender needs to be kept in mind, while interpreting the results of TOMASS. Future studies need to be conducted with other brands of Marie biscuit and in other age groups.
Keywords: Crackers; Oro-pharyngeal Efficiency; TOMASS.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestThere is no conflict of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids and the Timed Water Swallow Test: Reliability, associations, age and gender effects, and normative data.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):67-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12768. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023. PMID: 36036753 Free PMC article.
-
Test of mastication and swallowing solids in healthy individuals aged 6 to 20 years: A normative study in an Indian context.J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Sep;51(9):1839-1847. doi: 10.1111/joor.13741. Epub 2024 May 20. J Oral Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 38767112
-
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Normative data for two crackers available in the Scandinavian and international markets.Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-337. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1800090. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021. PMID: 32867525
-
The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for the Adult Indian Population.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep;73(3):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02429-8. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 34471621 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding functionality of sucrose in biscuits for reformulation purposes.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(14):2225-2239. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1442315. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019. PMID: 29521516 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing Swallowing and Mastication Using the Swallowing Proficiency for Eating and Drinking Protocol Among Healthy Adults.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):2590-2600. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04575-1. Epub 2024 Mar 7. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38883485 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources