Pharyngocutaneous Fistula in Salvage Laryngectomy: Use of the Stapler Versus Manual Suturing Technique
- PMID: 37636788
- PMCID: PMC10447661
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03587-7
Pharyngocutaneous Fistula in Salvage Laryngectomy: Use of the Stapler Versus Manual Suturing Technique
Abstract
A pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most common complication after salvage total laryngectomy (STL) with an incidence ranging from 5 to 73%, causing an increase in morbidity and delaying the patient's recovery. A surgical technique to prevent PCF formation is the use of the stapler to suture the pharyngeal mucosa. We have reviewed the medical files of 91 patients who had undergone STL, dividing the patients into two groups (manual suture vs. stapler), based on the type of pharyngeal suture performed during the STL. We found 12/49 (24.5%) cases of a PCF in group A (manual) and 5/42 (11.9%) cases of a PCF in group B (stapler). There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups with the patients in group B presenting better results in terms of the reduction of the surgical time, the length of the hospital stay and also in the restarting of oral feeding. The advantages of mechanical suturing with the stapler are reduced surgical times, a lower PCF formation rate, which involves an early removal of the nasogastric tube, and reduced hospitalization times. Further studies with a larger case series will be necessary to confirm the results obtained and to standardize the surgical technique.
Keywords: Laryngeal neoplasms; Pharyngocutaneous fistula; Surgical staplers; Total laryngectomy.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest
Figures
Similar articles
-
Stapler Pharyngeal Repair Versus Conventional Suturing After Laryngectomy in Jordanian Laryngeal Cancer Patients.Med Arch. 2022 Oct;76(5):363-367. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.363-367. Med Arch. 2022. PMID: 36545454 Free PMC article.
-
Stapler Versus Manual Suturing for Pharyngeal Closure in Total Laryngectomy.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2025 May;134(5):320-325. doi: 10.1177/00034894241308403. Epub 2024 Dec 20. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2025. PMID: 39707584
-
Stapler Use in Salvage Total Laryngectomy: A Useful Tool?Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):E473-E478. doi: 10.1002/lary.28737. Epub 2020 May 16. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 32415791
-
Impact of stapler versus manual closure techniques on pharyngocutaneous fistula development post-total laryngectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14751. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14751. Int Wound J. 2024. Retraction in: Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70618. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70618. PMID: 38472132 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Pharyngocutaneous fistula following total laryngectomy: analysis of risk factors, prognosis and treatment modalities.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Dec;35(6):400-5. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-626. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015. PMID: 26900245 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A matched pair analysis of outcomes after stapler-assisted pharyngeal closure following laryngectomy.J Laryngol Otol. 2025 Jan;139(1):78-84. doi: 10.1017/S0022215124001269. Epub 2024 Oct 22. J Laryngol Otol. 2025. PMID: 39435501 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources