A Survey for Assessment of Practical Aspects of End-of-life Practices across Indian Intensive Care Units
- PMID: 37636851
- PMCID: PMC10452772
- DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24500
A Survey for Assessment of Practical Aspects of End-of-life Practices across Indian Intensive Care Units
Abstract
Background: The end-of-life (EOL) decisions continue to be debated for their moral and legal standing. The acceptance of these decisions varies, based upon the perceptions and personal choices of the intensivists.
Materials and methods: An online questionnaire-based survey was designed and circulated among the practicing intensivists via Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) e-mail.
Results: Out of 200 responses, 165 (82.5%) affirmed that EOL decisions are routinely undertaken in their intensive care units. The most prevalent reasons expressed for avoidance of EOL decisions are moral and ethical dilemmas and fear of litigation. There is notable variability in the practice of withholding (47.7%) vs withdrawal (3.5%) of therapies. A good proportion of intensivists follow do-not-intubate (91%) and do-not-resuscitate (86%) orders, whereas only 18% affirmed to be practicing terminal extubation. About 93% of the respondents acknowledged the use of monitoring toward the EOL, and 49% reported the use of preformatted documents. A meager 2% admitted to facing a medicolegal issue after taking an EOL decision.
Conclusion: The survey establishes a general acceptance among the Indian intensivists regarding providing compassionate care to terminally ill patients, especially toward the EOL. The pattern of responses, however, indicates significant dilemmas and hesitancy with regard to the decision-making process.
How to cite this article: Kumar A, Sinha S, Mani RK. A Survey for Assessment of Practical Aspects of End-of-life Practices across Indian Intensive Care Units. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):531-536.
Keywords: Decision-making; End-of-life care; India; Intensive care units; Surveys and questionnaires.
Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: Dr Raj Kumar Mani is associated as the National Advisory Board of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal's standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of this editorial board member and his research group.
References
-
- Medical Treatment of Terminally Ill Patients (for the Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners). 196th Report of Law Commission of India; 2006 Available from: http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nicin/reports/report196.pdf. Accessed on: 8 March 2023.
-
- Aruna Ramakrishna Shanbaugh vs. The Union of India and Ors. 2011 4 SCC 454 and 524. Writ petition (crl.) no(s). 115 of 2009, date: 07/03/2011 SC. Available from: http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/wr1152009. Accessed on: 8 March 2023.
-
- Myatra SN, Salins N, Iyer S, Macaden SC, Divatia JV, Muckaden M, et al. End-of-life care policy: An integrated care plan for the dying: A joint position statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) and the Indian Association of Palliative Care (IAPC). Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(9):615–635. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.140155. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union of India and Anr. Writ petition (CIVIL) no. 215 of. 2005 https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2005/9123/9123_2005_Judgement_09-Ma.... Accessed on: 8 March 2023.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources