Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10:11:1186929.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186929. eCollection 2023.

Counseling and support services for healthcare workers in German university hospitals during the pandemic-descriptive results of a Germany-wide cross-sectional survey

Elisabeth Diehl  1 , Lina Marie Mülder  2   3 , Carolin Imm  1 , Peter Kegel  1 , Marian Tolksdorf  1 , Hauke Felix Wiegand  4 , Nikolaus Röthke  4 , Oliver Tüscher  4   5 , Klaus Lieb  4   5 , Henrik Walter  6 , Susanne Liebe  7 , Birgit Maicher  8 , Sabine Hellwig  9 , Kristina Adorjan  10 , Stefan Unterecker  11 , Manfred Beutel  2 , Dirk-Matthias Rose  1
Affiliations

Counseling and support services for healthcare workers in German university hospitals during the pandemic-descriptive results of a Germany-wide cross-sectional survey

Elisabeth Diehl et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) are experiencing tremendous levels of emotional and physical stress. Hospitals are trying to help personnel cope with work-related pressure. The aim of this study was to assess HCWs' awareness and utilization of counseling and support services during the pandemic, HCWs' unmet counseling and support needs, and the type and content of these services.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from January to June 2021 through the German national research organization Network University Medicine (NUM). All participating hospitals (6 in total) were asked to inform their employees about the study.

Results: A total of 1,495 HCWs were included in the analysis. Of these, 42.8% (n = 637) were frontline HCWs (who had contact with COVID-19 patients), 23.1% (n = 344) were second-line HCWs (who only had contact with non-COVID-19 patients) and 34.1% (n = 508) had no contact with any patients. Participating hospitals offer various counseling and support services for their staff. The percentage of respondents who were unaware of available counseling and support services ranged from 5.0 to 42.0%. Depending on the type of counseling and support services, 23.0-53.6% of the respondents indicated that counseling and support services were provided but not used, while 1.7-11.6% indicated that, despite the need for them, such services were not available. HCWs' overall satisfaction with the provided counseling and support services and their unmet support needs differed by patient contact: Frontline HCWs reported more unmet needs for counseling and support than second-line HCWs, while second-line HCWs reported more unmet needs than HCWs without patient contact.

Conclusion: The results indicate that hospitals should make more efforts to inform HCWs about available counseling and support services. Hospitals could also create networks where HCWs could share information about the type and content of services and their experiences with various counseling and support services. These steps would enable hospitals to respond more quickly and effectively to the problems facing HCWs during pandemics.

Keywords: COVID; SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; corona; counseling services; employee assistance program (EAP); frontline healthcare worker; second-line healthcare worker; support services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unmet needs regarding type of counseling and support services.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unmet needs for counseling and support services.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Misra-Hebert AD, Jehi L, Ji X, Nowacki AS, Gordon S, Terpeluk P, et al. . Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers’ risk of infection and outcomes in a large, integrated health system. J Gen Intern Med. (2020) 35:3293–301. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06171-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pemmerl S, Treml C, Hüfner A. Ein Jahr Coronapandemiemanagement an einem 300-Betten-Krankenhaus: report der Pandemiebeauftragten [One year corona pandemic management in a 300-bed hospital: report of the pandemic officer]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. (2021) 117:549–57. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00867-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lefrant J-Y, Fischer M-O, Potier H, Degryse C, Jaber S, Muller L, et al. . A national healthcare response to intensive care bed requirements during the COVID-19 outbreak in France. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. (2020) 39:709–15. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.09.007, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gala KB, Gala BM, Gala FB. Are radiological diagnostic centres ready to tackle COVID-19 pandemic? An Indian perspective. Indian J Radiol Imaging. (2021) 31:S15–20. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_466_20, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams JG, Walls RM. Supporting the health care workforce during the COVID-19 global epidemic. JAMA. (2020) 323:1439–40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3972 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types