Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 12;57(36):13304-13312.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01885. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

Cleaning Up without Messing Up: Maximizing the Benefits of Plastic Clean-Up Technologies through New Regulatory Approaches

Affiliations
Review

Cleaning Up without Messing Up: Maximizing the Benefits of Plastic Clean-Up Technologies through New Regulatory Approaches

Jannike Falk-Andersson et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

As the global plastics crisis grows, numerous technologies have been invented and implemented to recover plastic pollution from the environment. Although laudable, unregulated clean-up technologies may be inefficient and have unintended negative consequences on ecosystems, for example, through bycatch or removal of organic matter important for ecosystem functions. Despite these concerns, plastic clean-up technologies can play an important role in reducing litter in the environment. As the United Nations Environment Assembly is moving toward an international, legally binding treaty to address plastic pollution by 2024, the implementation of plastic clean-up technologies should be regulated to secure their net benefits and avoid unintended damages. Regulation can require environmental impact assessments and life cycle analysis to be conducted predeployment on a case-by-case basis to determine their effectiveness and impact and secure environmentally sound management. During operations catch-efficiency and bycatch of nonlitter items, as well as waste management of recovered litter, should be documented. Data collection for monitoring, research, and outreach to mitigate plastic pollution is recommended as added value of implementation of clean-up technologies.

Keywords: added value; bycatch; clean-up technology; externalities; litter; plastic pollution; plastics treaty; regulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical depictions of categories of plastic clean-up technologies, as classified in Schmaltz, Melvin, demonstrating the diversity of plastic clean-up technologies that currently exist. These are deployed in various environments, use unique methods, and target different kinds of plastic pollution (all figures are original and developed by authors of this article).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Suggested elements for evaluation of clean-up technologies to secure environmentally sound management and added value. To secure environmentally sound management, EIAs and LCAs should be conducted predeployment, while during deployment the catch-efficiency, bycatch rates, and waste management should be documented. During deployment, collection of data for monitoring and research, as well as implementation of outreach projects, would provide added value of implementing the clean-up technology.

References

    1. From Pollution to Solution. A Global Assessment of Marine Litter and Plastic Pollution; UNEP: Nairobi, 2021; p 150.
    1. Simon N.; et al. A binding global agreement to address the life cycle of plastics. Science 2021, 373 (6550), 43–47. 10.1126/science.abi9010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borrelle S. B.; et al. Why we need an international agreement on marine plastic pollution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114 (38), 9994–9997. 10.1073/pnas.1714450114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergmann M.; et al. A global plastic treaty must cap production. Science 2022, 376 (6592), 469–470. 10.1126/science.abq0082. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marine Litter Vital Graphics; United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal: Nairobi and Arendal, 2016; p 57.

Publication types