Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 1;48(4):412-421.
doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000263. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

Biomechanical characteristics of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses during gait: A review of literature

Affiliations
Review

Biomechanical characteristics of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses during gait: A review of literature

Reihaneh Ravari et al. Prosthet Orthot Int. .

Abstract

Background: Osseointegration (OI) is an emerging technique that allows a direct connection between the bone and a titanium metal implant, allowing the direct attachment of bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) to address the problems associated with socket prostheses. This review article aims to compare the biomechanical features of gait when using a transfemoral BAP in comparison to healthy gait, and in comparison to the gait of traditional transfemoral socket prosthesis users.

Methods: A computer-based literature search of electronic databases since inception (ranging from 1967 to 2004 depending on the database) to June 14, 2022, identified peer-reviewed articles focusing on the temporal-spatial, kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography data related to transfemoral BAP gait. Eight articles were included that focused on these biomechanical features of gait in adults with BAP and were compared with socket prosthesis users or healthy gait.

Results: Compared with healthy participants, prosthesis users after OI surgery have slower speed and cadence, lower symmetry, longer duration of swing phase, increased pelvic and trunk motion, more hip extension, larger moments on the intact limb, and lower forces on the prosthetic side. Compared with transfemoral socket prosthesis gait, BAP gait shows faster cadence and longer duration of support phase. There are limited and inconsistent data on changes in trunk, pelvic, and hip motion with OI.

Conclusion: Based on this review, transfemoral BAP improve spatial-temporal parameters closer to normal gait when compared to socket gait, but there are persisting deficits compared with healthy gait. Additional studies are needed to confirm the changes in kinematics and kinetics when walking with a BAP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the Prevalence of Limb Loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:422–429.
    1. Imam B, Miller WC, Finlayson HC, et al. Incidence of lower limb amputation in Canada. Can J Public Health 2017;108:e374–e380.
    1. Mak AFT, Zhang M, Boone DA. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:161–174.
    1. Hagberg K, Brånemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: A survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25:186–194.
    1. Jaegers SMHJ, Arendzen JH, de Jongh HJ. Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: A kinematic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:736–743.

LinkOut - more resources