Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Sep;176(9):1145-1152.
doi: 10.7326/M22-2619. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias : A Randomized Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias : A Randomized Trial

Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan et al. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The role of computer-aided detection in identifying advanced colorectal neoplasia is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of computer-aided detection to colonoscopic detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias as well as adenomas, serrated polyps, and nonpolypoid and right-sided lesions.

Design: Multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04673136).

Setting: Spanish colorectal cancer screening program.

Participants: 3213 persons with a positive fecal immunochemical test.

Intervention: Enrollees were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with or without computer-aided detection.

Measurements: Advanced colorectal neoplasia was defined as advanced adenoma and/or advanced serrated polyp.

Results: The 2 comparison groups showed no significant difference in advanced colorectal neoplasia detection rate (34.8% with intervention vs. 34.6% for controls; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]) or the mean number of advanced colorectal neoplasias detected per colonoscopy (0.54 [SD, 0.95] with intervention vs. 0.52 [SD, 0.95] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.04 [99.9% CI, 0.88 to 1.22]). Adenoma detection rate also did not differ (64.2% with intervention vs. 62.0% for controls; aRR, 1.06 [99.9% CI, 0.91 to 1.23]). Computer-aided detection increased the mean number of nonpolypoid lesions (0.56 [SD, 1.25] vs. 0.47 [SD, 1.18] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.19 [99.9% CI, 1.01 to 1.41]), proximal adenomas (0.94 [SD, 1.62] vs. 0.81 [SD, 1.52] for controls; adjusted rate ratio, 1.17 [99.9% CI, 1.03 to 1.33]), and lesions of 5 mm or smaller (polyps in general and adenomas and serrated lesions in particular) detected per colonoscopy.

Limitations: The high adenoma detection rate in the control group may limit the generalizability of the findings to endoscopists with low detection rates.

Conclusion: Computer-aided detection did not improve colonoscopic identification of advanced colorectal neoplasias.

Primary funding source: Medtronic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M22-2619.

Publication types

Substances

Associated data